ArticleEuropean radiology2022
Evaluation of whole axillary status with lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patients with breast cancer.
Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk stratification system for sentinel lymph node metastasis in clinically node-negative early breast cancer with sonographically abnormal but cytologically negative axilla.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence can extract important features for diagnosing axillary lymph node metastasis in early breast cancer using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting three or more metastatic nodes using contrast-enhanced lymphatic US findings in early breast cancer.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- The value of the improved percutaneous and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound diagnostic classification in sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Predicting axillary metastasis in breast cancer using lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of one lymph node.The British journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Contrast-enhanced lymphatic US can improve the preoperative diagnostic performance for sentinel lymph nodes in early breast cancer.European radiology · 2023Article
- Comparison of lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of axillary sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer.The British journal of radiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to evaluate the whole axillary status of patients with breast cancer by lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (LCEUS).
methodsLCEUS was applied for 169 patients with suspected breast cancer. Abnormal patterns in lymphatic channels, sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), and non-enhanced but abnormal lymph nodes were investigated. The signs of distorted, attenuated, netted, or interrupted lymphatic channels, defective-filling or no-filling SLNs, and the appearance of non-enhanced but abnormal lymph nodes were designated as features of axillary metastasis. A positive outcome was given when any of the abnormal patterns was found in the LCEUS. The diagnostic efficiencies were calculated to differentiate the axillary lymphatic status using LCEUS for the whole axilla, compared with conventional ultrasound (US) and LCEUS for SLNs.
resultsThe LCEUS procedure was successfully performed for 157 breast cancer patients with axillary dissection. Compared to normal axillae, abnormal patterns had a significantly higher frequency in metastatic axillae (p = 0.000). Using conventional US to evaluate the whole axillae, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 69.1%, 71.9%, and 70.7%, respectively. When LCEUS was used for SLN evaluation to predict the whole axilla, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 66.2%, 89.9%, and 79.6%, respectively. When LCEUS was used as the whole axillary evaluation method, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 76.5%, 86.5%, and 82.2%, respectively.
conclusionLCEUS can be an accurate method to observe the whole axillae in breast cancer patients. Lymphatic channels, SLNs, and non-enhanced but abnormal lymph nodes constitute the LCEUS for whole axillary evaluation. KEY POINTS: • LCEUS can be an accurate method to observe the whole axillae in breast cancer patients. • Three aspects in the LCEUS for whole axillary evaluation are the lymphatic channels, sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), and non-enhanced but abnormal lymph nodes. • Signs of distorted, attenuated, netted, or interrupted lymphatic channels, defective-filling or no-filling SLNs, and the appearance of non-enhanced but abnormal lymph nodes were considered as features of axillary metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.