Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34165508›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2021

Prognosis of Patients With Early Breast Cancer Receiving 5 Years vs 2 Years of Adjuvant Bisphosphonate Treatment: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Thomas W P Friedl, Tanja Fehm, Volkmar Müller, Werner Lichtenegger, Jens Blohmer, Ralf Lorenz, Helmut Forstbauer, Visnja Fink, Inga Bekes, Jens Huober and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02181101 (Simultaneous Study of Gemcitabine-Docetaxel Combination Adjuvant Treatment, as Well as Extended Bisphosphonate and Surveillance-Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02181101 phase3completednot on this map

Simultaneous Study of Gemcitabine-Docetaxel Combination Adjuvant Treatment, as Well as Extended Bisphosphonate and Surveillance-Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLudwig-Maximilians - University of MunichRan2005 to 2013Enrolled3,754ConditionsBreast NeoplasmsArmsFEC-DocGemzar adjuvant chemotherapy, FEC-Doc adjuvant chemotherapy, Zoledronic acid i.v. 2 years, Zoledronic acid i.v. 5 years
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness and safety of bone protective interventions to mitigate bone loss and skeletal fractures experienced by patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. MASCC/ISOO Clinical Practice Statement: Adjuvant bone-modifying agents in primary breast cancer patients - prevention of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Mechanisms of Cancer-Induced Bone Pain.Journal of pain research · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A narrative review: research progress of adjuvant intensive endocrine therapy for early breast cancer.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas W P FriedlDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Tanja FehmDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Volkmar MüllerDepartment of Gynecology, University Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Werner LichteneggerCharité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany.
Jens BlohmerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany.
Ralf LorenzGynecologic Practice Dres Lorenz, Hecker, Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany.
Helmut ForstbauerHemato-Oncological Practice Dres Forstbauer and Ziske, Troisdorf, Germany.
Visnja FinkDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Inga BekesDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Jens HuoberDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Julia JückstockDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andreas SchneeweissNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hans TeschDepartment of Oncology, Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany.
Sven MahnerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sara Y BruckerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Georg HeinrichOncological Practice, Fürstenwalde, Germany.
Lothar HäberleDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
Peter A FaschingDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
Matthias W BeckmannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
Robert E ColemanSheffield Cancer Research Centre, Weston Park Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Wolfgang JanniDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Brigitte RackDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
University Hospital Ulm · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DECardiovascular Center Bethanien · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceBisphosphonate treatment in patients with early breast cancer has become part of care, but the optimal treatment duration is still unclear.

objectiveTo compare 2 vs 5 years of zoledronate treatment following adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThe SUCCESS A phase 3 multicenter randomized open-label clinical trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design enrolled 3754 patients from September 21, 2005, to March 12, 2007 (last patient out, May 7, 2014). Final data analysis was conducted from September 2019 to October 2020. In 250 German study centers, patients were eligible for participation in the SUCCESS A trial if they had either node-positive or high-risk node-negative (defined as at least 1 of the following: tumor size ≥ pT2, histologic grade 3, negative hormone receptor status, or age ≤35 years) primary invasive breast cancer.

interventionsPatients were first randomized to adjuvant chemotherapy with 3 cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide followed by 3 cycles of docetaxel with or without gemcitabine (not presented in this report). After chemotherapy, patients underwent a second randomization of 5 years of zoledronate treatment (4 mg intravenously every 3 months for 2 years, followed by 4 mg intravenously every 6 months for 3 years) vs 2 years of zoledronate treatment (4 mg intravenously every 3 months for 2 years). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point of the study was disease-free survival; secondary end points were overall survival, distant disease-free survival, and the incidence of skeletal-related adverse events. Survival times were measured from 2 years after the start of zoledronate treatment (landmark analysis).

resultsOverall, data on 2987 patients were available for analysis; median age was 53 (range, 21-86) years. Disease-free survival, overall survival, and distant disease-free survival did not differ significantly between the 2 treatment arms (5 vs 2 years) as shown by adjusted multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models (disease-free survival: hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.75-1.25; P = .81; overall survival: HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.67-1.42; P = .90; distant disease-free survival: HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.65-1.18; P = .38). Adverse events were observed more often in the 5-year (46.2%) vs 2-year (27.2%) zoledronate treatment arm, which was particularly true for the skeletal-related events bone pain (5 years, 8.3% vs 2 years, 3.7%) and arthralgia (5 years, 5.1% vs 2 years, 3.1%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this phase 3 randomized clinical trial indicate that extending the zoledronate treatment beyond 2 years does not improve the prognosis of high-risk patients with early breast cancer receiving chemotherapy, suggesting that the currently recommended bisphosphonate treatment duration of 3 to 5 years could be reduced.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02181101.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDiphosphonatesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedDiphosphonates

Identifiers

PMID34165508
PMCPMC8227465
OpenAlexW3176697521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.