Trial reportCardiology journal2023
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with takotsubo syndrome versus spontaneous coronary artery dissection.
Trial report in Cardiology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01947621 (International Multicenter Registry on Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
International Multicenter Registry on Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes in Takotsubo syndrome vs. spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cardiology journal · 2026Pooled it
- Patient characteristics and incidence of in-hospital events in spontaneous coronary artery dissection and suspected concurrent Takotsubo syndrome: A report of the iSCAD registry.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy: An Exploration of the Intersection Between Stress, Coronary Dysfunction, and Cardiac Outcomes.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Migraine and spontaneous coronary artery dissection: A retrospective case-control study.Headache · 2025Article
- Recurrent Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Association with Takotsubo Syndrome and Fibromuscular Dysplasia; Comprehensive Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTakotsubo syndrome (TTS) and spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) are now increasingly recognized. Both conditions predominantly affect females; however, the exact pathophysiology remains unclear. Large multi-center databases can help elucidate the underlying mechanism and optimize treatments to improve outcomes by allowing us to compare features and outcomes of patients with TTS and patients with SCAD.
methodsTakotsubo syndrome patients were enrolled from the International Takotsubo Registry and compared to SCAD patients from the Canadian Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Cohort Study. In total 2098 TTS patients and 750 SCAD patients were included in the present study.
resultsMore than 85% of patients in both groups were females. TTS patients were older compared to SCAD patients. Physical triggers were more common in TTS patients, while emotional triggers and non-identifiable triggering events were more common in SCAD patients. Left ventricular ejection fraction was more impaired in TTS compared to SCAD. TTS patients had more major cardiovascular risk factors, while SCAD patients had a higher rate of migraines and anxiety disorders than TTS patients. Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher in TTS patients, while 30-day stroke rates were comparable between groups.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that women are at higher risk for TTS and SCAD compared to men, which should be considered in the differential diagnosis of those presenting with acute coronary syndrome. Additionally, emotional stressors play a significant role in triggering events particularly in younger women suffering from SCAD. The present findings may help clinicians better differentiate these two entities and aid in the appropriate risk stratification, diagnosis, and management.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT01947621.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.