Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34165145›Full record

ArticleAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2021

What Drives Preventive Health Behavior During a Global Pandemic? Emotion and Worry.

Karin G Coifman, David J Disabato, Pallavi Aurora, T H Stanley Seah, Benjamin Mitchell, Nicolle Simonovic, Jeremy L Foust, Pooja Gupta Sidney, Clarissa A Thompson, Jennifer M Taber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. How Are Perceived Ambiguity and Risk Beliefs Related? Evidence From Longitudinal and Daily Diary Data.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Interplay between Discrete Emotions and Preventive Behavior in Health Crises: Big Data Analysis of COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Karin G CoifmanDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2372-0081
David J DisabatoDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.
Pallavi AuroraDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.
T H Stanley SeahDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.
Benjamin MitchellDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.
Nicolle SimonovicDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.
Jeremy L FoustDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.
Pooja Gupta SidneyDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Clarissa A ThompsonDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.
Jennifer M TaberDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.

Funding

Applied Psychology Center, Kent State UniversityU.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences Grant R305U200004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: Primary prevention of COVID-19 has focused on encouraging compliance with specific behaviors that restrict contagion. This investigation sought to characterize engagement in these behaviors in U.S. adults early during the pandemic and to build explanatory models of the psychological processes that drive them.

methodsUS adults were recruited through Qualtrics Research Panels (N = 324; 55% female; Mage = 50.91, SD = 15.98) and completed 10 days of online reports of emotion, COVID-19 perceived susceptibility and worry, and recommended behaviors (social distancing, hand washing, etc.). Factor analysis revealed behaviors loaded on two factors suggesting distinct motivational orientations: approach and avoidance.

resultsChanges in approach and avoidance behaviors over the 10 days indicated large individual differences consistent with three types of participants. Discrete emotions, including fear, guilt/shame, and happiness were associated with more recommended behaviors. Fear and COVID-19 worry indirectly influenced each other to facilitate more behavioral engagement. While emotions and worry strongly predicted individual differences in behavior across the 10 days, they did not predict as well why behaviors occurred on one day versus another.

conclusionsThese findings suggest how daily affective processes motivate behavior, improving the understanding of compliance and efforts to target behaviors as primary prevention of disease.

Indexed as

CognitionEmotionsHealth BehaviorMotivationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Ecological Momentary AssessmentFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2COVID-19EmotionHealth BehaviorHealth CognitionPrevention

Identifiers

PMID34165145
PMCPMC8344868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.