Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34165137›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2021

Entrainment of Network Activity by Closed-Loop Microstimulation in Healthy Ambulatory Rats.

Alberto Averna, Page Hayley, Maxwell D Murphy, Federico Barban, Jimmy Nguyen, Stefano Buccelli, Randolph J Nudo, Michela Chiappalone, David J Guggenmos

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Post-Ischemic Reorganization of Sensory Responses in Cerebral Cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. LFP Analysis of Brain Injured Anesthetized Animals Undergoing Closed-Loop Intracortical Stimulation.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Alberto AvernaRehab Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova 16163, Italy.
Page HayleyDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City 66160, USA.
Maxwell D MurphyDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City 66160, USA.
Federico BarbanRehab Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova 16163, Italy.
Jimmy NguyenUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas 66160, USA.
Stefano BuccelliRehab Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova 16163, Italy.
Randolph J NudoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City 66160, USA.
Michela ChiappaloneRehab Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova 16163, Italy.
David J GuggenmosDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City 66160, USA.
University of Kansas Medical Center · USItalian Institute of Technology · ITUniversity of Kansas · USUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

REORGANIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX FOLLOWING BRAIN INJURYR01NS030853 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI NUDO, RANDOLPH J. · 1993 to 2020
$6.5M
Kansas University Training Program in Neurological and Rehabilitation SciencesT32HD057850 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jacob J. Sosnoff · 2009 to 2026
$3.4M
The contribution of premotor cortex to recovery after stroke.R01NS133403 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI DAVID GUGGENMOS · 2023 to 2026
$1.7M
Shaping Motor Recovery After Stroke Using Activity-Dependent StimulationR03HD094608 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI GUGGENMOS, DAVID · 2018 to 2019
$306k
Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International CollaborationNICHD NIH HHS R03 HD094608NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD057850NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS030853NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS133403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As our understanding of volitional motor function increases, it is clear that complex movements are the result of the interactions of multiple cortical regions rather than just the output properties of primary motor cortex. However, our understanding of the interactions among these regions is limited. In this study, we used the activity-dependent stimulation (ADS) technique to determine the short/long-term effects on network activity and neuroplasticity of intracortical connections. ADS uses the intrinsic neural activity of one region to trigger stimulations in a separate region of the brain and can manipulate neuronal connectivity in vivo. Our aim was to compare single-unit neuronal activity within premotor cortex (rostral forelimb area, [RFA] in rats) in response to ADS (triggered from RFA) and randomly-generated stimulation in the somatosensory area (S1) within single sessions and across 21 consecutive days of stimulation. We examined firing rate and correlation between spikes and stimuli in chronically-implanted healthy ambulatory rats during spontaneous and evoked activity. At the end of the treatment, we evaluated changes of synaptophysin expression. Our results demonstrated the ability of ADS to modulate RFA firing properties and to promote synaptogenesis in S1, strengthening the idea that this Hebbian-inspired protocol can be used to modulate cortical connectivity.

Indexed as

Motor CortexAnimalsElectric StimulationForelimbNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsRatsactivity-dependent stimulationmotor cortexneuronal plasticityneurophysiology

Identifiers

PMID34165137
PMCPMC8491688
OpenAlexW3176679440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.