Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34165126›Full record

ReviewChemical Society reviews2021

Directing evolution of novel ligands by mRNA display.

Golnaz Kamalinia, Brian J Grindel, Terry T Takahashi, Steven W Millward, Richard W Roberts

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical Society reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Dosa: A method to covalently barcode proteins for high-throughput biochemistry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Golnaz KamaliniaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. tttakaha@usc.edu.
Brian J Grindel
Terry T Takahashi
Steven W Millward
Richard W Roberts
University of Southern California · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Translational Pre/Postdoctoral Program in Cancer NanotechnologyT32CA196561 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Gang Bao, Konstantin V Sokolov · 2015 to 2026
$3.0M
Development of SUPR peptides as PET Imaging Agents for Her2+ Breast CancerR44CA206771 · NCI · EVORX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · PI FIACCO, STEPHEN, MILLWARD, STEVEN W · 2016 to 2018
$2.0M
SUPR Peptides to Inhibit Undruggable Cancer Target (PQ18)R01CA170820 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ROBERTS, RICHARD W, TAKAHASHI, TERRY TORAO · 2012 to 2015
$1.8M
Pro-Drug Enolase Inhibitors in Precision OncologyR01CA231509 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MILLWARD, STEVEN W · 2021 to 2025
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA170820NCI NIH HHS R01 CA231509NCI NIH HHS R44 CA206771NCI NIH HHS T32 CA196561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

mRNA display is a powerful biological display platform for the directed evolution of proteins and peptides. mRNA display libraries covalently link the displayed peptide or protein (phenotype) with the encoding genetic information (genotype) through the biochemical activity of the small molecule puromycin. Selection for peptide/protein function is followed by amplification of the linked genetic material and generation of a library enriched in functional sequences. Iterative selection cycles are then performed until the desired level of function is achieved, at which time the identity of candidate peptides can be obtained by sequencing the genetic material. The purpose of this review is to discuss the development of mRNA display technology since its inception in 1997 and to comprehensively review its use in the selection of novel peptides and proteins. We begin with an overview of the biochemical mechanism of mRNA display and its variants with a particular focus on its advantages and disadvantages relative to other biological display technologies. We then discuss the importance of scaffold choice in mRNA display selections and review the results of selection experiments with biological (e.g., fibronectin) and linear peptide library architectures. We then explore recent progress in the development of "drug-like" peptides by mRNA display through the post-translational covalent macrocyclization and incorporation of non-proteogenic functionalities. We conclude with an examination of enabling technologies that increase the speed of selection experiments, enhance the information obtained in post-selection sequence analysis, and facilitate high-throughput characterization of lead compounds. We hope to provide the reader with a comprehensive view of current state and future trajectory of mRNA display and its broad utility as a peptide and protein design tool.

Indexed as

Directed Molecular EvolutionLigandsPeptide LibraryAnimalsHumansPeptidesProteinsRNA, MessengerLigandsPeptide LibraryPeptidesProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID34165126
PMCPMC8725378
OpenAlexW3176537811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.