Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34164878›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2021

Living in the concrete jungle: carnivore spatial ecology in urban parks.

Siria Gámez, Nyeema C Harris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. ScavengingPeerJ · 2022
    Article
  11. Living in the concrete jungle: carnivore spatial ecology in urban parks.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Siria GámezDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 1101 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1496-1665
Nyeema C HarrisDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 1101 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5174-2205

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People and wildlife are living in an increasingly urban world, replete with unprecedented human densities, sprawling built environments, and altered landscapes. Such anthropogenic pressures can affect multiple processes within an ecological community, from spatial patterns to interspecific interactions. We tested two competing hypotheses, human shields vs. human competitors, to characterize how humans affect the carnivore community using multispecies occupancy models. From 2017 to 2020, we conducted the first camera survey of city parks in Detroit, Michigan, and collected spatial occurrence data of the local native carnivore community. Our 12,106-trap night survey captured detection data for coyotes (Canis latrans), red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), raccoons (Procyon lotor), and striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis). Overall occupancy varied across species (Ψ

Indexed as

CarnivoraParks, RecreationalAnimalsCitiesCoyotesFoxesMephitidaeMichiganRaccoonscamera surveycitycommunity structurecoyoteDetroitdistributionhuman shieldoccupancyoverlap

Identifiers

PMID34164878
PMCPMC9285087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.