Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34164771›Full record

ReviewArchives of pharmacal research2021

Recent advances in CRISPR technologies for genome editing.

Myeonghoon Song, Taeyoung Koo

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of pharmacal research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Myeonghoon SongDepartment of life and Nanopharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Taeyoung KooDepartment of life and Nanopharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. taeyoungkoo@khu.ac.kr.
Kyung Hee University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) system, and its development into a set of powerful tools for manipulating the genome, has revolutionized genome editing. Precise, targeted CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing has become the most widely used platform in organisms ranging from plants to animals. The CRISPR/Cas system has been extensively modified to increase its efficiency and fidelity. In addition, the fusion of various protein motifs to Cas effector proteins has facilitated diverse set of genetic manipulations, such as base editing, transposition, recombination, and epigenetic regulation. The CRISPR/Cas system is undergoing continuous development to overcome current limitations, including off-target effects, narrow targeting scope, and issues associated with the delivery of CRISPR components for genome engineering and therapeutic approaches. Here, we review recent progress in a diverse array of CRISPR/Cas-based tools. We also describe limitations and concerns related to the use of CRISPR/Cas technologies.

Indexed as

AnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsEpigenesis, GeneticGene EditingHumansProtein EngineeringBase editorsCasCRISPREpigenetic regulatorsGenome editingPrime editors

Identifiers

PMID34164771
OpenAlexW3177075436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.