ArticleClinical rheumatology2021
An analysis of scientometric data and publication policies of rheumatology journals.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ranking of addiction journals in eight widely used impact metrics.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2022Article
- Trends in reader access and article processing charges among urology journals: A systematic review.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveScientometric indexes, based on citations, may be increased by open access (OA) publishing. We aimed to present the scientometric data of of rheumatology journals and analyze the scientometric data of rheumatology journals according to the OA publication policy.
methodScientometric indexes and bibliometric data of 22 journals were obtained from Clarivate Analytics InCites, Scopus, and Scimago Journal & Country Rank websites. We included journal impact factor (JIF), CiteScore (CS), Hirsch index (HI), Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP), Eigenfactor score (ES), and Scientific Journal Ranking (SJR). We separated the OA publishing policies into full OA and hybrid OA. The US dollar (USD) was used as the requested fee unit.
resultsAll pairs of scientometric indexes had positive significant correlations. However, a journal in the first quartile of JIF was observed in the second quartile of CS, SNIP, and SJR, and the last quartile of ES and HI. Scientometric indexes of of full and hybrid OA journals were similar, apart from HI, which was higher in hybrid OA journals (p = 0.03, Mann-Whitney U test). However, full OA journal fees were less expensive by a median of 935 USD (p = 0.007, Mann-Whitney U test).
conclusionWe recommend that the JIF and HI pair or the ES paired with CS or SNIP be used together to evaluate rheumatology journals. We failed to show that the OA model positively affects the scientometric indexes of rheumatology journals; our results contradict the literature reporting that the OA publication model causes an increase in citations. Key Points •Clinicians should understand the scientometric indexes in rheumatology and if open access publishing affects citations (therefore, scientometric indexes). •The JIF and HI pair or the ES paired with CS or SNIP can be used to express different rankings since they are based on different databases and use different calculation methods. •We show that OA publication does not affect citations or scientometric indexes of rheumatology journals. •When choosing a rheumatology journal to publish OA, rheumatologists should consider individual OA citation patterns and APC charges together.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34164738What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.