Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34164737›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2021

Can treating rheumatoid arthritis with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs at the window of opportunity with tight control strategy lead to long-term remission and medications free remission in real-world clinical practice? A cohort study.

Sanaz Ebrahimian, Amin Salami, Aida Malek Mahdavi, Kamal Esalatmanesh, Alireza Khabbazi, Mehrzad Hajialilo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sanaz EbrahimianConnective Tissue Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Amin SalamiConnective Tissue Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Aida Malek MahdaviConnective Tissue Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Kamal EsalatmaneshAutoimmune Diseases Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
Alireza KhabbaziConnective Tissue Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. dr.khabazi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9482-6967
Mehrzad HajialiloConnective Tissue Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRKashan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this retrospective study is to compare the results of starting rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment with tight control strategy in the window of opportunity and later phases of the disease in real-world clinical practice.

methodsIn this cohort, 609 RA patients were divided into three groups: (i) very early treatment (VET): ≤ 3 months; (ii) early treatment (ET): 3-12 months; and (iii) late treatment (LT) > 12 months after the onset of the disease. Four levels of remission were defined: (i) sustained remission on treatment, (ii) sustained glucocorticoids free remission, (iii) sustained disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) free remission, and (iv) long-term remission. Outcome was assessed based on the number of patients in sustained or long-term remission and patients with poor joint outcome and systemic involvement.

resultsThere were no significant differences in the remission rate between the groups. Time to sustained remission in VET group was shorter than ET and LT groups. There were no significant differences in the rate and duration of prednisolone discontinuation in the studied groups. DMARDs were discontinued in VET, ET, and LT groups in 8.7%, 10.2%, and 7% of the patients, respectively. Poor joint outcome occurred in 33.2%, 50.5%, and 59.4% of the patients in the VET, ET, and LT groups, respectively. Remission induction in the first year of the treatment was associated with long-term remission in the VET, ET, and LT groups.

conclusionsMedications free remission in RA is rare, and although treatment with DMARDs within 3 months of the onset of the disease can prevent joint damage, it cannot lead to long-term remission and discontinuation of medications. KEY POINTS: • Medications free remission in rheumatoid arthritis is rare. • Treatment with DMARDs within 3 months of the onset of the disease can prevent joint damage, but it cannot lead to long-term remission and discontinuation of medications.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidCohort StudiesHumansRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsDisease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)Long-term remissionReal-world clinical practiceRheumatoid arthritisWindow of opportunity

Identifiers

PMID34164737
OpenAlexW3173399946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.