Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34164731›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2021

Bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely.

Yanshi Liu, Feiyu Cai, Kai Liu, Xingpeng Zhang, Hong Li, Xuefei Fu, Tao Zhang, Aihemaitijiang Yusufu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Yanshi Liu *Department of Trauma and Microreconstructive Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Feiyu Cai *Department of Trauma and Microreconstructive Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Kai LiuDepartment of Trauma and Microreconstructive Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Xingpeng ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Pudong New Area People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Hong LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Zigong Fourth People's Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, China.
Xuefei FuDepartment of Orthopedics, Anhui No. 2 Provincial People's Hospital, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Tao ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China. ztypp@163.com.
Aihemaitijiang YusufuDepartment of Trauma and Microreconstructive Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China. ahmatjang@163.com.
Xinjiang Medical University · CNAnhui Provincial Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University · CNPudong New Area People's Hospital · CNTianjin Hospital · CNZigong First People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs the monolateral external fixator is increasingly used in trauma-control and definitive management for high-energy long bone fractures, timing the fixator removal remains a challenge for surgeons. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of the bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely.

methodsA total of 131 patients with tibial shaft fractures treated by the monolateral external fixator in our institution were collected from January 2013 to July 2019. In group I, the fixators were removed based on the clinical and radiological assessment only by the treating surgeon. As for group II, the axial load-share (LS) ratio test was accomplished by another medical team without the knowledge of the clinical results. The external fixator was removed when the mechanical test outcome (LS ratio < 10%) was consistent with the conclusion drawn from the clinical and radiological assessment (bone union achieved) by the treating surgeon.

resultsThere was no statistical significance in demographic data between the two groups (P > 0.05). In group I, four patients suffered refracture (the refracture rate was 7.7%) after fixator removal and were successfully treated by an intramedullary nail. In group II, 71 patients underwent fixator removal after the first mechanical test, and another eight patients terminated the external fixation after the second test. None of the 79 patients in group II suffered refracture (the refracture rate was 0%). There was statistical significance in the refracture rate between the two groups (P < 0.05).

conclusionThe bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo using the additional circular frame components is an effectively quantitative indicator to complement the clinical assessment of fracture healing in a monolateral external fixation treatment. Removal of the monolateral external fixator is safe when the axial load-share ratio dropped below 10%.

Indexed as

Bony CallusTibial FracturesExternal FixatorsFracture FixationFracture HealingHumansTreatment OutcomeAxial load-share ratioBony callus stiffnessFracture healingMonolateral external fixatorTiming of fixator removal

Identifiers

PMID34164731
PMCPMC8626363
OpenAlexW3175677697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.