Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34164688›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2021

Selection on Phalanx Development in the Evolution of the Bird Wing.

Merijn A G de Bakker, Wessel van der Vos, Kaylah de Jager, Wing Yu Chung, Donald A Fowler, Esther Dondorp, Stephan N F Spiekman, Keng Yih Chew, Bing Xie, Rafael Jiménez and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Theories, laws, and models in evo-devo.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

Merijn A G de BakkerAnimal Science & Health, Institute of Biology Leiden (IBL), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Wessel van der VosAnimal Science & Health, Institute of Biology Leiden (IBL), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Kaylah de JagerAnimal Science & Health, Institute of Biology Leiden (IBL), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Wing Yu ChungAnimal Science & Health, Institute of Biology Leiden (IBL), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Donald A FowlerAnimal Science & Health, Institute of Biology Leiden (IBL), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Esther DondorpNaturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Stephan N F SpiekmanPaläontologisches Institut und Museum, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Keng Yih ChewAnimal Science & Health, Institute of Biology Leiden (IBL), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Bing XieAnimal Science & Health, Institute of Biology Leiden (IBL), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rafael JiménezDepartamento de Genética, Universidad de Granada, Lab 127 Centro de Investigación Biomédica, Granada, Spain.
Constanze BickelmannMuseum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung, Berlin, Germany.
Shigeru KurataniLaboratory for Evolutionary Morphology, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe, Japan.
Radim BlazekInstitute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
Peter KondrashovKirksville College of Osteopathic Medicine, A. T. Still University of Health Sciences, Kirksville, MO, USA.
Marilyn B RenfreeSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4589-0436
Michael K RichardsonAnimal Science & Health, Institute of Biology Leiden (IBL), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1222-8101
Leiden University · NLA.T. Still University · USCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Biology · CZMuseum für Naturkunde · DENaturalis Biodiversity Center · NLRIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research · JPThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversidad de Granada · ESUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The frameshift hypothesis is a widely accepted model of bird wing evolution. This hypothesis postulates a shift in positional values, or molecular-developmental identity, that caused a change in digit phenotype. The hypothesis synthesized developmental and paleontological data on wing digit homology. The "most anterior digit" (MAD) hypothesis presents an alternative view based on changes in transcriptional regulation in the limb. The molecular evidence for both hypotheses is that the MAD expresses Hoxd13 but not Hoxd11 and Hoxd12. This digit I "signature" is thought to characterize all amniotes. Here, we studied Hoxd expression patterns in a phylogenetic sample of 18 amniotes. Instead of a conserved molecular signature in digit I, we find wide variation of Hoxd11, Hoxd12, and Hoxd13 expression in digit I. Patterns of apoptosis, and Sox9 expression, a marker of the phalanx-forming region, suggest that phalanges were lost from wing digit IV because of early arrest of the phalanx-forming region followed by cell death. Finally, we show that multiple amniote lineages lost phalanges with no frameshift. Our findings suggest that the bird wing evolved by targeted loss of phalanges under selection. Consistent with our view, some recent phylogenies based on dinosaur fossils eliminate the need to postulate a frameshift in the first place. We suggest that the phenotype of the Archaeopteryx lithographica wing is also consistent with phalanx loss. More broadly, our results support a gradualist model of evolution based on tinkering with developmental gene expression.

Indexed as

DinosaursWings, AnimalAnimalsBirdsExtremitiesPhylogenyapoptosisevo-devoframeshift theory, bird, reptilehox geneslimb developmentphalanx-forming region

Identifiers

PMID34164688
PMCPMC8476175
OpenAlexW3175222768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.