Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34164652›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular research2022

Hooked on heart regeneration: the zebrafish guide to recovery.

Katherine M Ross Stewart, Sophie L Walker, Andrew H Baker, Paul R Riley, Mairi Brittan

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. TheCells · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Harnessing the regenerative potential ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Beating the heart failure odds: long-term survival after myocardial ischemia in juvenile rainbow trout.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine M Ross StewartCentre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0760-0514
Sophie L WalkerCentre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9613-4534
Andrew H BakerCentre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1441-5576
Paul R RileyDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy & Genetics, University of Oxford, Sherrington Building, Sherrington Rd, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9862-7332
Mairi BrittanCentre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3830-200X
The Queen's Medical Research Institute · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/11/1/28798British Heart Foundation CH/11/2/28733British Heart Foundation FS/16/4/31831British Heart Foundation FS/19/55/34890British Heart Foundation RG/14/3/30706British Heart Foundation RG/18/5/33532British Heart Foundation RM/17/3/33381Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 108906/B/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While humans lack sufficient capacity to undergo cardiac regeneration following injury, zebrafish can fully recover from a range of cardiac insults. Over the past two decades, our understanding of the complexities of both the independent and co-ordinated injury responses by multiple cardiac tissues during zebrafish heart regeneration has increased exponentially. Although cardiomyocyte regeneration forms the cornerstone of the reparative process in the injured zebrafish heart, recent studies have shown that this is dependent on prior neovascularization and lymphangiogenesis, which in turn require epicardial, endocardial, and inflammatory cell signalling within an extracellular milieu that is optimized for regeneration. Indeed, it is the amalgamation of multiple regenerative systems and gene regulatory patterns that drives the much-heralded success of the adult zebrafish response to cardiac injury. Increasing evidence supports the emerging paradigm that developmental transcriptional programmes are re-activated during adult tissue regeneration, including in the heart, and the zebrafish represents an optimal model organism to explore this concept. In this review, we summarize recent advances from the zebrafish cardiovascular research community with novel insight into the mechanisms associated with endogenous cardiovascular repair and regeneration, which may be of benefit to inform future strategies for patients with cardiovascular disease.

Indexed as

Heart InjuriesZebrafishAnimalsCell ProliferationHeartMyocytes, CardiacSignal TransductionZebrafish ProteinsZebrafish ProteinsHeartModelMyocardial infarctionRegenerationZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID34164652
PMCPMC9215194
OpenAlexW3174148568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.