Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34164590›Full record

ArticleACS earth & space chemistry2021

HCOOH in the remote atmosphere: Constraints from Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) airborne observations.

Xin Chen, Dylan B Millet, J Andrew Neuman, Patrick R Veres, Eric A Ray, Róisín Commane, Bruce C Daube, Kathryn McKain, Joshua P Schwarz, Joseph M Katich and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS earth & space chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Enhanced CHNature communications · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Large contribution of biomass burning emissions to ozone throughout the global remote troposphere.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Xin ChenDepartment of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.
Dylan B MilletDepartment of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.
J Andrew NeumanNOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305.
Patrick R VeresNOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305.
Eric A RayNOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305.
Róisín CommaneDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, New York, NY 10964.
Bruce C DaubeDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Kathryn McKainCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309.
Joshua P SchwarzNOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305.
Joseph M KatichNOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305.
Karl D FroydNOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305.
Gregory P SchillNOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305.
Michelle J KimDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
John D CrounseDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
Hannah M AllenDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
Eric C ApelAtmospheric Chemistry Observations & Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307.
Rebecca S HornbrookAtmospheric Chemistry Observations & Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307.
Donald R BlakeDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697.
Benjamin A NaultCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309.
Pedro Campuzano-JostCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309.
Jose L JimenezCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309.
Jack E DibbEarth Systems Research Center/EOS, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824.
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences · USCalifornia Institute of Technology · USNOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory · USNSF National Center for Atmospheric Research · USUniversity of Minnesota · USLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory · USPlanetary Science Institute · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of New Hampshire · US

Funding

NASA NNX14AP89GNASA NNX15AH33AShared Services Center NASA 80NSSC18K0630Shared Services Center NASA 80NSSC19K0124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Formic acid (HCOOH) is an important component of atmospheric acidity but its budget is poorly understood, with prior observations implying substantial missing sources. Here we combine pole-to-pole airborne observations from the Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom) with chemical transport model (GEOS-Chem CTM) and back trajectory analyses to provide the first global in-situ characterization of HCOOH in the remote atmosphere. ATom reveals sub-100 ppt HCOOH concentrations over most of the remote oceans, punctuated by large enhancements associated with continental outflow. Enhancements correlate with known combustion tracers and trajectory-based fire influences. The GEOS-Chem model underpredicts these in-plume HCOOH enhancements, but elsewhere we find no broad indication of a missing HCOOH source in the background free troposphere. We conclude that missing non-fire HCOOH precursors inferred previously are predominantly short-lived. We find indications of a wet scavenging underestimate in the model consistent with a positive HCOOH bias in the tropical upper troposphere. Observations reveal episodic evidence of ocean HCOOH uptake, which is well-captured by GEOS-Chem; however, despite its strong seawater undersaturation HCOOH is not consistently depleted in the remote marine boundary layer. Over fifty fire and mixed plumes were intercepted during ATom with widely varying transit times and source regions. HCOOH:CO normalized excess mixing ratios in these plumes range from 3.4 to >50 ppt/ppb CO and are often over an order of magnitude higher than expected primary emission ratios. HCOOH is thus a major reactive organic carbon reservoir in the aged plumes sampled during ATom, implying important missing pathways for in-plume HCOOH production.

Indexed as

Atmospheric Tomography Missionback trajectorychemical transport modeldepositionfireformic acidiodide CIMSremote atmosphere

Identifiers

PMID34164590
PMCPMC8216292
OpenAlexW3161698690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.