ArticleInternational journal of population data science2020
Using general practice clinical information system data for research: the case in Australia.
Article in International journal of population data science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using general practice data for chronic disease prevalence: the impact of record linkage on estimation accuracy.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Article
- Digital health technology use in Australian general practice (GP) consultations: a cross-sectional analysis of the medicine in Australia: balancing employment and life study.Primary health care research & development · 2025Article
- Estimating the cost of chronic kidney disease in Australia.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Sex disparities in the prevalence, incidence, and management of diabetes mellitus: an Australian retrospective primary healthcare study involving 668,891 individuals.BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Undercounting diagnoses in Australian general practice: a data quality study with implications for population health reporting.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Advancing cross-sectoral data linkage to understand and address the health impacts of social exclusion: Challenges and potential solutions.International journal of population data science · 2023Article
- Agreement of acute serious events recorded across datasets using linked Australian general practice, hospital, emergency department and death data: implications for research and surveillance.International journal of population data science · 2023Article
- Article
- Oral Anticoagulant Discontinuation and Its Predictors in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Australian general practitioner perceptions to sharing clinical data for secondary use: a mixed method approach.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Identifying primary care datasets and perspectives on their secondary use: a survey of Australian data users and custodians.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- General Practice Statistics in Australia: Pushing a Round Peg into a Square Hole.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Evaluating the accuracy of data extracted from electronic health records into MedicineInsight, a national Australian general practice database.International journal of population data science · 2022Article
- Associations between regular GP contact, diabetes monitoring and glucose control: an observational study using general practice data.BMJ open · 2021Observational
- Validity of algorithms for identifying five chronic conditions in MedicineInsight, an Australian national general practice database.BMC health services research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
General practice is often a patient's first point of contact with the health system and the gateway to specialist services. In Australia, different aspects of the health system are managed by the Commonwealth Government and individual state / territory governments. Although there is a long history of research using administrative data in Australia, this split in the management and funding of services has hindered whole-system research. Additionally, the administrative data typically available for research are often collected for reimbursement purposes and lack clinical information. General practices collect a range of patient information including diagnoses, medications prescribed, results of pathology tests ordered and so on. Practices are increasingly using clinical information systems and data extraction tools to make use of this information. This paper describes approaches used on several research projects to access clinical, as opposed to administrative, general practice data which to date has seen little use as a resource for research. This information was accessed in three ways. The first was by working directly with practices to access clinical and management data to support research. The second involved accessing general practice data through collaboration with Primary Health Networks, recently established in Australia to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of health services for patients. The third was via NPS MedicineWise's MedicineInsight program, which collects data from consenting practices across Australia and makes these data available to researchers. We describe each approach including data access requirements and the advantages and challenges of each method. All approaches provide the opportunity to better understand data previously unavailable for research in Australia. The challenge of linking general practice data to other sources, currently being explored for general practice data, is discussed. Finally, we describe some general practice data collections used for research internationally and how these compare to collections available in Australia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.