Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34164563›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2021

Radiogenomics in brain, breast, and lung cancer: opportunities and challenges.

Apurva Singh, Rhea Chitalia, Despina Kontos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Apurva SinghUniversity of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5600-800X
Rhea ChitaliaUniversity of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Despina KontosUniversity of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES013508 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Trevor M Penning · 2006 to 2026
$35.3M
Radiogenomic Biomarkers of Breast Cancer RecurrenceR01CA223816 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHODOSH, LEWIS A, KONTOS, DESPINA · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
Predictive and Diagnostic Radiomic Signatures in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)on ImmunotherapyR01CA264835 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KATZ, SHARYN, KONTOS, DESPINA · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
Multi-parametric 4-D Imaging Biomarkers for Neoadjuvant Treatment ResponseR01CA197000 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KONTOS, DESPINA · 2016 to 2020
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197000NCI NIH HHS R01 CA223816NCI NIH HHS R01 CA264835NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES013508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of radiogenomics largely focuses on developing imaging surrogates for genomic signatures and integrating imaging, genomic, and molecular data to develop combined personalized biomarkers for characterizing various diseases. Our study aims to highlight the current state-of-the-art and the role of radiogenomics in cancer research, focusing mainly on solid tumors, and is broadly divided into four sections. The first section reviews representative studies that establish the biologic basis of radiomic signatures using gene expression and molecular profiling information. The second section includes studies that aim to non-invasively predict molecular subtypes of tumors using radiomic signatures. The third section reviews studies that evaluate the potential to augment the performance of established prognostic signatures by combining complementary information encoded by radiomic and genomic signatures derived from cancer tumors. The fourth section includes studies that focus on ascertaining the biological significance of radiomic phenotypes. We conclude by discussing current challenges and opportunities in the field, such as the importance of coordination between imaging device manufacturers, regulatory organizations, health care providers, pharmaceutical companies, academic institutions, and physicians for the effective standardization of the results from radiogenomic signatures and for the potential use of these findings to improve precision care for cancer patients.

Indexed as

cancer researchprecision medicineprognostic signaturesradiogenomics

Identifiers

PMID34164563
PMCPMC8212946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.