Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34164464›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021

Machine learning-based prediction of anatomical outcome after idiopathic macular hole surgery.

Yu Xiao, Yijun Hu, Wuxiu Quan, Bin Zhang, Yuqing Wu, Qiaowei Wu, Baoyi Liu, Xiaomin Zeng, Zhanjie Lin, Ying Fang and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Yu XiaoGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital; Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences; the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yijun HuGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital; Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences; the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wuxiu QuanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Bin ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Yuqing WuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Qiaowei WuGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital; Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences; the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Baoyi LiuGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital; Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences; the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaomin ZengGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital; Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences; the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhanjie LinGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital; Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences; the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ying FangGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital; Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences; the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yu HuDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Songfu FengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ling YuanDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Hongmin CaiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Honghua YuGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital; Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences; the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Tao LiState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNSouth China University of Technology · CNSouthern Medical University · CNGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University · CNKunming Medical University · CNZhujiang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo develop a machine learning (ML) model for the prediction of the idiopathic macular hole (IMH) status at 1 month after vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling (VILMP) surgery.

methodsA total of 288 IMH eyes from four ophthalmic centers were enrolled. All eyes underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT) examinations upon admission and one month after VILMP. First, 1,792 preoperative macular OCT parameters and 768 clinical variables of 256 eyes from two ophthalmic centers were used to train and internally validate ML models. Second, 224 preoperative macular OCT parameters and 96 clinical variables of 32 eyes from the other two centers were utilized for external validation. To fulfill the purpose of predicting postoperative IMH status (i.e., closed or open), five ML algorithms were trained and internally validated by the ten-fold cross-validation method, while the best-performing algorithm was further tested by an external validation set.

resultsIn the internal validation, the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of the five ML algorithms were 0.882-0.951. The AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the best-performing algorithm (i.e., random forest, RF) were 0.951, 0.892, 0.973, and 0.904, respectively. In the external validation, the AUC of RF was 0.940, with an accuracy of 0.875, a specificity of 0.875, and a sensitivity of 0.958.

conclusionsBased on the preoperative OCT parameters and clinical variables, our ML model achieved remarkable accuracy in predicting IMH status after VILMP. Therefore, ML models may help optimize surgical planning for IMH patients in the future.

Indexed as

Anatomical outcomesidiopathic macular hole (IMH)machine learning (ML)prediction model

Identifiers

PMID34164464
PMCPMC8184483
OpenAlexW3161178045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.