Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34164379›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2021

Tribochemistry, Mechanical Alloying, Mechanochemistry: What is in a Name?

Adam A L Michalchuk, Elena V Boldyreva, Ana M Belenguer, Franziska Emmerling, Vladimir V Boldyrev

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. BaTiOLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2024
    Article
  18. Meeting the UN Sustainable Development Goals with Mechanochemistry.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam A L MichalchukFederal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Berlin, Germany.
Elena V BoldyrevaNovosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Ana M BelenguerYusef Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Franziska EmmerlingFederal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Berlin, Germany.
Vladimir V BoldyrevNovosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the decades, the application of mechanical force to influence chemical reactions has been called by various names: mechanochemistry, tribochemistry, mechanical alloying, to name but a few. The evolution of these terms has largely mirrored the understanding of the field. But what is meant by these terms, why have they evolved, and does it really matter how a process is called? Which parameters should be defined to describe unambiguously the experimental conditions such that others can reproduce the results, or to allow a meaningful comparison between processes explored under different conditions? Can the information on the process be encoded in a clear, concise, and self-explanatory way? We address these questions in this Opinion contribution, which we hope will spark timely and constructive discussion across the international mechanochemical community.

Indexed as

mechanical activationmechanical alloyingmechanochemical pictographsmechanochemistrynomenclaturetribochemistrytribology

Identifiers

PMID34164379
PMCPMC8216082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.