ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
Training and Validation of Deep Learning-Based Auto-Segmentation Models for Lung Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Using Retrospective Radiotherapy Planning Contours.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical evaluation of three deep learning contouring models for head and neck organs at risk and lymph node levels.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Radiation in Veterinary Practice: Paradigm Shift Toward Precision and Curative Approaches.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A prospective multicenter trial of deep learning auto-segmentation for organs at risk in thoracic radiotherapy.Nature communications · 2026Observational
- Fractal-driven self-supervised learning enhances early-stage lung cancer GTV segmentation: a novel transfer learning framework.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- A semi-automated workflow for cohort-wise preparation of radiotherapy data for dose-response modeling, including autosegmentation of organs at risk.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Trade-off of different deep learning-based auto-segmentation approaches for treatment planning of pediatric craniospinal irradiation autocontouring of OARs for pediatric CSI.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Using deep learning generated CBCT contours for online dose assessment of prostate SABR treatments.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- AI-Guided Delineation of Gross Tumor Volume for Body Tumors: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Deep learning for autosegmentation for radiotherapy treatment planning: State-of-the-art and novel perspectives.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025Review
- Evaluating deep learning auto-contouring for lung radiation therapy: A review of accuracy, variability, efficiency and dose, in target volumes and organs at risk.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Review
- Clinical evaluation of a deep learning CBCT auto-segmentation software for prostate adaptive radiation therapy.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024Article
- A deep learning approach for automatic tumor delineation in stereotactic radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer using diagnostic PET-CT and planning CT.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Implementation of a Commercial Deep Learning-Based Auto Segmentation Software in Radiotherapy: Evaluation of Effectiveness and Impact on Workflow.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Clinical Validation of a Deep-Learning Segmentation Software in Head and Neck: An Early Analysis in a Developing Radiation Oncology Center.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Scalable radiotherapy data curation infrastructure for deep-learning based autosegmentation of organs-at-risk: A case study in head and neck cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- The value of AI in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Malignant Lung Cancer.Frontiers in radiology · 2022Review
- Assessment of Optimizers and their Performance in Autosegmenting Lung Tumors.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDeep learning-based auto-segmented contour (DC) models require high quality data for their development, and previous studies have typically used prospectively produced contours, which can be resource intensive and time consuming to obtain. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using retrospective peer-reviewed radiotherapy planning contours in the training and evaluation of DC models for lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR).
methodsUsing commercial deep learning-based auto-segmentation software, DC models for lung SABR organs at risk (OAR) and gross tumor volume (GTV) were trained using a deep convolutional neural network and a median of 105 contours per structure model obtained from 160 publicly available CT scans and 50 peer-reviewed SABR planning 4D-CT scans from center A. DCs were generated for 50 additional planning CT scans from center A and 50 from center B, and compared with the clinical contours (CC) using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD).
resultsComparing DCs to CCs, the mean DSC and 95% HD were 0.93 and 2.85mm for aorta, 0.81 and 3.32mm for esophagus, 0.95 and 5.09mm for heart, 0.98 and 2.99mm for bilateral lung, 0.52 and 7.08mm for bilateral brachial plexus, 0.82 and 4.23mm for proximal bronchial tree, 0.90 and 1.62mm for spinal cord, 0.91 and 2.27mm for trachea, and 0.71 and 5.23mm for GTV. DC to CC comparisons of center A and center B were similar for all OAR structures.
conclusionsThe DCs developed with retrospective peer-reviewed treatment contours approximated CCs for the majority of OARs, including on an external dataset. DCs for structures with more variability tended to be less accurate and likely require using a larger number of training cases or novel training approaches to improve performance. Developing DC models from existing radiotherapy planning contours appears feasible and warrants further clinical workflow testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.