Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34164318›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2021

A systematic review and meta-analysis of traditional Chinese medicine with chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Gang Shi, Dan Yu, Juan Wu, Yanru Liu, Ruizhen Huang, Cheng Shun Zhang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06154109 (Comparative Efficacy of Xiaopi Granules and Decoction in Improving Pathological Complete Response of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Triple-negative Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06154109 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Efficacy of Xiaopi Granules and Decoction in Improving Pathological Complete Response of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Triple-negative Breast Cancer: a Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorZhiyu WangRan2023 to 2026Enrolled90ConditionsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsArmsXiaopi granules, Xiaopi decoction, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gang ShiDepartment of Pharmacy Service, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Dan YuDepartment of Pharmacy Service, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Juan WuDepartment of Pharmacy Service, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Yanru LiuDepartment of Cardiovascular, Chengdu Qingbajiang District Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Ruizhen HuangDepartment of Cardiovascular, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Cheng Shun ZhangAcupuncture and Tuina School/Third Teaching Hospital, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the continuous progression of a new generation of adjuvant chemotherapy, the survival time of breast cancer patients has also been significantly improved. Chemotherapy alone will cause a series of side effects, which will seriously affect the quality of life of breast cancer patients. Chinese medicine combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy has a unique advantage in the treatment of breast cancer.

methodsEnglish databases were searched using combinations of the following search terms: "traditional Chinese medicine", "neoadjuvant hemotherapy", "breast cancer", and "tumor of breast". Publications in which traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) combined with neoadjuvant therapy was the experimental group and chemotherapy alone was the control group were screened.

resultsA total of 12 publications were included in the meta-analysis. The efficiency of the performance status score was used to test for heterogeneity, Chi DISCUSSION: The meta-analysis confirmed that using TCM combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy to treat breast cancer has obvious advantages over chemotherapy alone in terms of the objective curative effect, the performance status score effective rate, the TCM syndrome score change, and the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions after chemotherapy.

Indexed as

breast cancerneoadjuvant chemotherapyTraditional Chinese medicine (TCM)

Identifiers

PMID34164318
PMCPMC8184394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.