Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34164275›Full record

ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2021

Disease control and objective responsive rates in randomized phase II trials evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of 74 trials.

Hiromi Matsumoto, Nobuyuki Horita, Kentaro Ito, Risa Ebina-Shibuya, Yu Hara, Nobuaki Kobayashi, Takeshi Kaneko

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hiromi MatsumotoDepartment of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine. Yokohama, Japan.
Nobuyuki HoritaDepartment of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine. Yokohama, Japan.
Kentaro ItoRespiratory Center, Matsusaka Municipal Hospital, Matsusaka, Japan.
Risa Ebina-ShibuyaPediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Yu HaraDepartment of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine. Yokohama, Japan.
Nobuaki KobayashiDepartment of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine. Yokohama, Japan.
Takeshi KanekoDepartment of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine. Yokohama, Japan.
Yokohama City University · JPNational Cancer Institute · USSoka Municipal Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although objective response rate and disease control rate are commonly used as primary endpoints of lung cancer trials, it remains unclear whether objective response rate and disease control rate correctly reflect the overall survival in a non-small cell lung cancer phase II trial evaluating a non-first-line chemotherapy. Objective response rate might be easily affected by chance because the small number of patients in each trial achieved complete or partial response in the phase II non-first-line setting. This study was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (UMIN000040412). Four databases were searched for eligible trials. A Spearman's rank correlation with hazard ratio of overall survival was calculated each for odds ratio of objective response rate, difference of objective response rate (%), odds ratio of disease control rate, and difference of disease control rate (%). Of 74 eligible trials, 73 reported objective response rate and 68 reported disease control rates. Nine (12%) trials included patients with driver mutation status. Thirteen (18%) and two (3%) RCTs specifically included adenocarcinoma/non-squamous and squamous subtype of non-small cell lung cancer, respectively. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2 (N=41, 55%) and the performance status 0-1 (N=25, 34%) were frequently used performance status criteria. The median number of patients in the two arms was 116 (interquartile range, 82-159). The correlation between trial-level odds ratio of objective response rate and hazard ratio of overall survival was weak (r=-0.29, 95% CI: -0.49 to -0.05, P=0.014). An exploratory subgroup analysis suggested that fewer responders were associated with poorer correlation. Odds ratio of disease control survival (r=-0.53, 95% CI: -0.68 to -0.32, P<0.001) had moderate rank correlations with hazard ratio of overall survival. Instead of objective response rate, disease control rate should be used as the primary endpoint in a randomized phase II trial evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Indexed as

correlation of dataLung neoplasmresponse evaluation criteria in solid tumorssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34164275
PMCPMC8182707
OpenAlexW3160219522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.