Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34164273›Full record

ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2021

Liquid biopsy in non-small cell lung cancer-current status and future outlook-a narrative review.

Elisabeth Smolle, Valentin Taucher, Jörg Lindenmann, Martin Pichler, Freyja-Maria Smolle-Juettner

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The integrated comprehension of lncRNA HOXA-AS3 implication on human diseases.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisabeth SmolleDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Valentin TaucherDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Barmherzige Schwestern Ried, Ried, Austria.
Jörg LindenmannDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Martin PichlerDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Freyja-Maria Smolle-JuettnerDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Medical University of Graz · ATAGO Austria · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer ranks first as the cause of cancer-associated deaths gobally. The American Cancer Society estimates for 228,820 new cases and 135,720 deaths from lung cancer in the United States for the year 2020. Targeted treatment options have rapidly emerged for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) within the past decade. Screening for molecular aberrations is mainly done by tissue biopsy. However, in some cases a biopsy is not possible, or patients do not consent to it. Hence, liquid biopsy remains the only option. Relevant data about the topic of liquid biopsy, with a special focus on NSCLC, was obtained via a PubMed search. We included mainly literature published from 2010 onwards, omitting older studies whenever possible. With this review of the literature, we give an overview of different liquid biopsy approaches, as well as their respective advantages and disadvantages. We have reviewed the assessment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in particular, and go into detail with current use of liquid biopsy in everyday clinical practice. Today, liquid biopsy is still infrequently used, depending on the treatment center, but popularity is steadily increasing. Various different approaches are already available, but costs and level of sensitivity significantly differ between techniques. By using liquid biopsy more widely in selected patients, complication rates can be reduced, and constant disease monitoring is made considerably easier.

Indexed as

Liquid biopsynon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)prognosistreatment

Identifiers

PMID34164273
PMCPMC8182706
OpenAlexW3158164320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.