ArticleCureus2021
Microsporidial Keratitis Related to Water Exposure: A Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microsporidium Keratitis After Hurricane Francine: A Case Report.Case reports in ophthalmological medicine · 2026Article
- Digital PCR detection of microsporidia in household pipe water of patients with microsporidial keratitis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Atypical progression of microsporidial keratoconjunctivitis to immune ring keratitis: a case report.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this retrospective study was to present a series of cases involving the rare ocular disease of microsporidia keratitis treated at a private practice clinic and describe the details regarding specific water exposure, clinical course, voriconazole treatment, and increased prevalence of this infection in Augusta, Georgia, USA. Our analysis was based on the accumulated data from all patients (n=15) diagnosed with microsporidia keratitis at our private practice clinic; the clinical course of three cases is discussed in detail in this article. Specific environmental exposures were documented in 10 patients. All patients self-reported that they had no acquired immunodeficiency. In all cases, patients had complete resolution of active symptoms after receiving treatment with 1-2% topical voriconazole, with an approximate average primary treatment duration of 40.1 ± 17.1 days (median: 40 days, range: 14-70 days). None of the patients reported any clinically significant adverse effects from therapy. There have been increasing reports about this emerging infectious pathogen, particularly in Asia. However, there is limited data in the literature on the etiology, pathogenesis, and treatment of microsporidia-caused ophthalmic diseases. In this case series, we highlight the strong correlation of our patients' condition with specific types of water exposure in the USA as well as the complete resolution of active disease in all our patients as a result of monotherapy with topical voriconazole.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.