Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34164128›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2021

Evaluation of postoperative outcomes in patients following multi-level surgical reconstructions with the use Avive

Cameron T Cox, Joash R Suryavanshi, Bradley O Osemwengie, Sterling Rosqvist, Matthew Blue, Desirae McKee, Brendan J MacKay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cameron T CoxDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0026-9272
Joash R SuryavanshiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Bradley O OsemwengieDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Sterling RosqvistDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7530-9956
Matthew BlueDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Desirae McKeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2646-399X
Brendan J MacKayDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7538-2857
Texas Tech University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment of patients with traumatic axonotmesis presents challenges. Processed human umbilical cord membrane has been recently developed with improved handling and resorption time compared to other amniotic membrane wraps, and may be beneficial in nerve reconstruction. This study evaluates postoperative outcomes after traumatic peripheral nerve injury after placement of commercially available processed human umbilical cord membrane.

methodsWe performed a prospective, single-center pilot study of patients undergoing multi-level surgical reconstruction for exposed, non-transected peripheral nerve. Functional outcomes including pain, range of motion, pinch and grip strength, and the QuickDASH and SF-36 patient-reported outcome measures were recorded, when possible, at the 1-week and 3, 6, and 9 months postop visit. One-tailed paired

resultsTwenty patients had processed human umbilical cord membrane placement without surgical complications. Mean follow-up was 7.5 months (range: 3-10 months) and mean age was 39 years (range: 15-65). Twelve (67%) patients were male, and the majority of placement sites were in the upper extremity (85%). Mean preoperative visual analog scale pain score was significantly reduced at most recent follow-up, as were QuickDASH scores. All patients had improved functional outcomes at the 9-month follow-up, and SF-36 outcomes at 9 months showed improvement across all dimensions.

conclusionThis study indicates that processed human umbilical cord membrane may be a useful adjunct in nerve surgery with noted improvements in postoperative function, pain, and patient-reported outcome measures. Future studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes after traumatic nerve injury treated with processed human umbilical cord membrane.

Indexed as

Nerve surgerynerve wrappartially transected nerve injury

Identifiers

PMID34164128
PMCPMC8188973
OpenAlexW3173050850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.