Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34164114›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2021

RNAmining: A machine learning stand-alone and web server tool for RNA coding potential prediction.

Thaís A R Ramos, Nilbson R O Galindo, Raúl Arias-Carrasco, Cecília F da Silva, Vinicius Maracaja-Coutinho, Thaís G do Rêgo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Interpretation of RNA Universe and Coding Potential Using IntRNA.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thaís A R RamosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Bioinformática, Bioinformatics Multidisciplinary Environment (BioME), Instituto Metrópole Digital, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6699-7742
Nilbson R O GalindoDepartamento de Informática, Centro de Informática, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9305-6449
Raúl Arias-CarrascoAdvanced Center for Chronic Diseases (ACCDiS), Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-1698-9282
Cecília F da SilvaDepartamento de Informática, Centro de Informática, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Vinicius Maracaja-CoutinhoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Bioinformática, Bioinformatics Multidisciplinary Environment (BioME), Instituto Metrópole Digital, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8873-9381
Thaís G do RêgoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Bioinformática, Bioinformatics Multidisciplinary Environment (BioME), Instituto Metrópole Digital, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are important players in the cellular regulation of organisms from different kingdoms. One of the key steps in ncRNAs research is the ability to distinguish coding/non-coding sequences. We applied seven machine learning algorithms (Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Neural Networks and Deep Learning) through model organisms from different evolutionary branches to create a stand-alone and web server tool (RNAmining) to distinguish coding and non-coding sequences. Firstly, we used coding/non-coding sequences downloaded from Ensembl (April 14th, 2020). Then, coding/non-coding sequences were balanced, had their trinucleotides count analysed (64 features) and we performed a normalization by the sequence length, resulting in total of 180 models. The machine learning algorithms validations were performed using 10-fold cross-validation and we selected the algorithm with the best results (eXtreme Gradient Boosting) to implement at RNAmining. Best F1-scores ranged from 97.56% to 99.57% depending on the organism. Moreover, we produced a benchmarking with other tools already in literature (CPAT, CPC2, RNAcon and TransDecoder) and our results outperformed them. Both stand-alone and web server versions of RNAmining are freely available at https://rnamining.integrativebioinformatics.me/.

Indexed as

Machine LearningRNAAlgorithmsBayes TheoremSupport Vector MachineRNAbenchmarkingcoding potential predictionMachine Learningnon-coding RNA

Identifiers

PMID34164114
PMCPMC8201426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.