ArticleChemical science2021
Thickness control of 2D nanosheets assembled from precise side-chain giant molecules.
Article in Chemical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Leveraging Macromolecular Isomerism for Phase Complexity in Janus Nanograins.ACS central science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The performance of 2D nanomaterials hinges on both the chemical compositions and the morphological structures across different length scales. Among all the three dimensions, thickness is the only one that falls into the nanometer scale and, to some extent, determines the intrinsic properties of 2D nanomaterials. In this study, we report the preparation and precise thickness control of 2D nanosheets assembled from a library of monodispersed amphiphilic giant molecules composed of functional polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSSs) as the side groups. Solution self-assembly of such giant molecules resulted in 2D nanosheets with similar structural configurations, where a bilayer of hydrophobic isobutyl POSS (BPOSS) is sandwiched by two monolayers of hydrophilic POSS bearing carboxylic acid groups (APOSS). The thickness of the obtained nanosheets could be tuned through adjusting the chemical compositions of the pendant POSS cages. Intriguingly, we found that the thickness of the 2D nanosheets was not necessarily proportional to the contour length of the giant molecule nor the total number of POSS cages tethered to the main chain. Indeed, the number ratio of BPOSS to APOSS, rather than the exact number, played a deterministic role in the thickness control. To explain the unusual thickness dependence, we built up a structure model with an in-plane orientation of the giant molecules in the nanosheets, from which a formula was further deduced to semi-quantitatively describe the inverse relationship between the overall thickness and the number ratio of BPOSS to APOSS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.