Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34163746›Full record

ReviewChemical science2021

Sharon E Ashbrook, Zachary H Davis, Russell E Morris, Cameron M Rice

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. RSC advances · 2026
    Review
  5. Understanding the Mechanism of Nontraditional Zeolite Synthesis UsingJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Experimental and computationalSolid state nuclear magnetic resonance · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. ExploitingChemical science · 2025
    Article
  10. Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. FromChemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sharon E AshbrookSchool of Chemistry, EaStCHEM and Centre of Magnetic Resonance, University of St Andrews St Andrews KY16 9ST UK sema@st-andrews.ac.uk rem1@st-andrews.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4538-6782
Zachary H DavisSchool of Chemistry, EaStCHEM and Centre of Magnetic Resonance, University of St Andrews St Andrews KY16 9ST UK sema@st-andrews.ac.uk rem1@st-andrews.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-7137
Russell E MorrisSchool of Chemistry, EaStCHEM and Centre of Magnetic Resonance, University of St Andrews St Andrews KY16 9ST UK sema@st-andrews.ac.uk rem1@st-andrews.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7809-0315
Cameron M RiceSchool of Chemistry, EaStCHEM and Centre of Magnetic Resonance, University of St Andrews St Andrews KY16 9ST UK sema@st-andrews.ac.uk rem1@st-andrews.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1705-9896

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microporous materials, containing pores and channels of similar dimensions to small molecules have a range of applications in catalysis, gas storage and separation and in drug delivery. Their complex structure, often containing different types and levels of positional, compositional and temporal disorder, makes structural characterisation challenging, with information on both long-range order and the local environment required to understand the structure-property relationships and improve the future design of functional materials. In principle,

Identifiers

PMID34163746
PMCPMC8179582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.