Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34163695›Full record

ArticleChemical science2021

Defining and navigating macrocycle chemical space.

Lauren A Viarengo-Baker, Lauren E Brown, Anna A Rzepiela, Adrian Whitty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mapping the binding sites of challenging drug targets.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lauren A Viarengo-BakerDepartment of Chemistry, Boston University 590 Commonwealth Ave Boston Massachusetts 02215 USA whitty@bu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9508-7940
Lauren E BrownDepartment of Chemistry, Boston University 590 Commonwealth Ave Boston Massachusetts 02215 USA whitty@bu.edu.
Anna A RzepielaPyxis Discovery Delftechpark 26 Delft 2628XH The Netherlands.
Adrian WhittyDepartment of Chemistry, Boston University 590 Commonwealth Ave Boston Massachusetts 02215 USA whitty@bu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0331-4369

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrocyclic compounds (MCs) are of growing interest for inhibition of challenging drug targets. We consider afresh what structural and physicochemical features could be relevant to the bioactivity of this compound class. Using these features, we performed Principal Component Analysis to map oral and non-oral macrocycle drugs and clinical candidates, and also commercially available synthetic MCs, in structure-property space. We find that oral MC drugs occupy defined regions that are distinct from those of the non-oral MC drugs. None of the oral MC regions are effectively sampled by the synthetic MCs. We identify 13 properties that can be used to design synthetic MCs that sample regions overlapping with oral MC drugs. The results advance our understanding of what molecular features are associated with bioactive and orally bioavailable MCs, and illustrate an approach by which synthetic chemists can better evaluate MC designs. We also identify underexplored regions of macrocycle chemical space.

Identifiers

PMID34163695
PMCPMC8179434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.