Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34163599›Full record

ArticleChemical science2020

Signal-enhanced real-time magnetic resonance of enzymatic reactions at millitesla fields.

Sergey Korchak, Anil P Jagtap, Stefan Glöggler

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025
    Article
  2. BiologicalSmall science · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Real-Time Pyruvate Chemical Conversion Monitoring Enabled by PHIP.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Metabolic Tumor Imaging with Rapidly Signal-Enhanced 1-Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2023
    Article
  8. A Field-Independent Method for the Rapid Generation of Hyperpolarized [1-Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Characterization of Protocatechuate 4,5-Dioxygenase fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sergey KorchakNMR Signal Enhancement Group, Max-Planck-Insitute for Biophysical Chemistry Am Faßberg 11 37077 Göttingen Germany stefan.gloeggler@mpibpc.mpg.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3354-6141
Anil P JagtapNMR Signal Enhancement Group, Max-Planck-Insitute for Biophysical Chemistry Am Faßberg 11 37077 Göttingen Germany stefan.gloeggler@mpibpc.mpg.de.
Stefan GlögglerNMR Signal Enhancement Group, Max-Planck-Insitute for Biophysical Chemistry Am Faßberg 11 37077 Göttingen Germany stefan.gloeggler@mpibpc.mpg.de.
Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phenomenon of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is widely applied in biomedical and biological science to study structures and dynamics of proteins and their reactions. Despite its impact, NMR is an inherently insensitive phenomenon and has driven the field to construct spectrometers with increasingly higher magnetic fields leading to more detection sensitivity. Here, we are demonstrating that enzymatic reactions can be followed in real-time at millitesla fields, three orders of magnitude lower than the field of state-of-the-art NMR spectrometers. This requires signal-enhancing samples

Identifiers

PMID34163599
PMCPMC8178804
OpenAlexW3094861192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.