ReviewChemical science2020
Local probe investigation of electrocatalytic activity.
Review in Chemical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlative optical, electron, and electrochemical microscopy assessment of localised sulphide reactivity in concrete aggregates.Journal of microscopy · 2026Article
- Non-Noble Metal Nanocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- In Situ Characterization of the Oxidation Behavior of Carbonate-Based Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion Batteries by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy.ACS electrochemistry · 2025Article
- Au Micro- and Nanoelectrodes as Local Voltammetric pH Sensors During Oxygen Evolution at Electrocatalyst-Modified Electrodes.Small science · 2024Article
- From NiMoOACS nano · 2021Article
- High-resolution imaging of catalytic activity of a single graphene sheet using electrochemiluminescence microscopy.Chemical science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the world energy crisis remains a long-term challenge, development and access to renewable energy sources are crucial for a sustainable modern society. Electrochemical energy conversion devices are a promising option for green energy supply, although the challenge associated with electrocatalysis have caused increasing complexity in the materials and systems, demanding further research and insights. In this field, scanning probe microscopy (SPM) represents a specific source of knowledge and understanding. Thus, our aim is to present recent findings on electrocatalysts for electrolysers and fuel cells, acquired mainly through scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) and other related scanning probe techniques. This review begins with an introduction to the principles of several SPM techniques and then proceeds to the research done on various energy-related reactions, by emphasizing the progress on non-noble electrocatalytic materials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.