Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34163445›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021

Comparison of Gut Microbiota of Yaks From Different Geographical Regions.

Wenwen Liu, Qiang Wang, Jiajia Song, Jinwei Xin, Songshan Zhang, Yuanhua Lei, Yuanli Yang, Peng Xie, Huayi Suo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wenwen LiuInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Qiang WangCollege of Food Science, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Jiajia SongCollege of Food Science, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Jinwei XinState Key Laboratory of Hulless Barley and Yak Germplasm Resources and Genetic Improvement, Lhasa, China.
Songshan ZhangInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yuanhua LeiInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yuanli YangInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Peng XieInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Huayi SuoCollege of Food Science, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiota are closely linked to host health and adaptability to different geographical environments. However, information on the influence of different geographical conditions on the intestinal microbiota of yaks is limited. In this study, 18 yak fecal samples were collected from three regions of China, namely Shangri-la, Lhasa, and Yushu, and were analyzed via high-throughput sequencing. The alpha diversity, as measured by the Shannon, ACE, and Chao indices, was the highest in the Shangri-la samples. Principal coordinate analysis detected significant differences in the composition of the intestinal microbiota of yaks from different regions. A total of six phyla, 21 families, and 29 genera were identified in the fecal samples. The dominant phyla in the samples were Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, and the most abundant family was Ruminococcaceae. In addition,

Indexed as

diversitygeographical regionsgut microbiotahigh-throughput sequencingyak

Identifiers

PMID34163445
PMCPMC8216380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.