ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2021
E-Learning for Undergraduate Medical Students.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anatomical knowledge retention in Obstetrics and Gynaecology residents and impact of an e-learning tool.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2023Trial
- Medical students' perceptions of the impact of case-based learning on engagement, cognitive skills, and communication.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Podcast-Based Medical Education and Content Alignment with National Education Bodies.Medical science educator · 2024Article
- The Impact of Patient-Centric Interactive E-Module in Pathology Among Medical Undergraduates.Medical science educator · 2023Article
- Students' perceptions on how e-learning platforms in universities should be improved to increase the quality of educational services.Journal of medicine and life · 2023Article
- E-Learning Performance Evaluation in Medical Education-A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Determining attitudes toward e-learning: what are the attitudes of health professional students?Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health · 2022Article
- Online medical education in Egypt during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide assessment of medical students' usage and perceptions.BMC medical education · 2022Review
- Self-control as an important factor affecting the online learning readiness of Vietnamese medical and health students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a network analysis.Journal of educational evaluation for health professions · 2022Article
- Academic Performance in Medical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review.Advances in medical education and practice · 2022Article
- Views on virtual education during the COVID-19 pandemic among medical and paramedical students in India.Bioinformation · 2022Article
- Online, Face-to-Face, or Blended Learning? Faculty and Medical Students' Perceptions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Study.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Outcomes of Remote Pathology Instruction in Student Performance and Course Evaluation.Academic pathologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDisruption of education can lead to drastic changes and therefore, we need to maximize the benefits of e-technology. We aimed to explore changes in knowledge, attitudes, and challenges regarding e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic and determine how e-learning has influenced academic performance.
methodsWe conducted a self-administrated electronic survey to collect information on undergraduate medical students' e-learning. We evaluated its validity, reliability and pilot tested the instrument.
resultsBetween August 7 and 19, 2020, we received 995 responses. The majority of respondents answered that they knew about the tools used for e-learning, such as mobile learning, links, online classes, e-assessment; 84% (n=836), 82% (n=815), 82% (n=811) and 80% (n=796), respectively. Two-third of the respondents gained fair/very good knowledge from online classes and discussion boards; 65% (n=635), and 63% (n=620), respectively. Regarding attitudes, less than half had "somewhat" adequate knowledge and proper training; 45% (n=449) and 36% (n=361), respectively, and less than a third had "somewhat" positive feelings; 29% (n=289). The reported challenges were poor Internet speed (55%, n=545) and the lack of clinical experience and physical examination skills (51%, n=512). There is a statistical difference between the test score for the first and second semesters for year 6, year 5, year 4, and year 2 (
conclusionMost respondents reported that they knew about e-learning tools and answered that they gained fair/very good amounts of knowledge accompanied by acceptable attitudes. The challenges need to be addressed to improve e-learning infrastructure. The transition to e-learning accompanied by increased academic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.