ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2021
Clinical Analysis of Severe Radiation Pneumonia.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Network pharmacology in combination with bibliometrics analysis on the mechanism of compound Kushen injection in the treatment of radiation pneumonia and lung cancer.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024Article
- Serum MMP-9 and SAA in the Diagnosis of Severe Pneumonia Caused by Radiotherapy of Esophageal Cancer.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe present study aims to discuss the clinical characteristics, factors, and treatment methods affecting the prognosis in patients with severe radiation pneumonia (RP).
methodsThe radiotherapy status, clinical features, imaging characteristics, laboratory examination results, treatment methods, and prognoses of 34 patients with severe RP treated in our department between January 2011 and July 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The severe RP grading was based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0; patients who scored Grade ≥3 were considered to have a severe case of RP.
resultsThe results of the present study showed that 22 patients had lung cancer, 6 had esophageal cancer, 5 had breast cancer, and 1 had colon cancer with lung metastasis. The total radiation dose was 37.5-66 Gy, and the overall average dose was 53 Gy; the average dose in the patients who died was 52.9 Gy. A total of 28 patients presented with a cough and sputum as the initial symptom, and 24 presented with wheezing as an accompanying symptom; of the 24 patients, 8 experienced fever, 2 experienced wheezing as the only symptom, 1 had chest pain, and 1 had chest tightness. In 26 patients, the changes were in the radiation field, and in 8 cases, the changes appeared both inside and outside the radiation field. After the use of glucocorticoid methylprednisolone, respiratory support, and anti-infection treatment, 18 patients were cured, 8 showed a condition improvement, and 8 died.
conclusionThe prognosis of severe RP was not significantly correlated with the administered radiation dose; however, lung cancer, a high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score, and delayed diagnosis were risk factors for patient death. However, a combination of antibiotic therapy, ventilator-assisted respiration, and steroid therapy could improve patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.