Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34163157›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2021

Mepolizumab for Eosinophil-Associated COPD: Analysis of METREX and METREO.

Ian D Pavord, Kenneth R Chapman, Mona Bafadhel, Frank C Sciurba, Eric S Bradford, Stephanie Schweiker Harris, Bhabita Mayer, David B Rubin, Steven W Yancey, Pierluigi Paggiaro

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02105948 phase3completednot on this map

Study MEA117106: Mepolizumab vs. Placebo as add-on Treatment for Frequently Exacerbating COPD Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2014 to 2017Enrolled837ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmsMepolizumab, Placebo
NCT02105961 phase3completednot on this map

Study MEA117113: Mepolizumab vs. Placebo as Add-on Treatment for Frequently Exacerbating COPD Patients Characterized by Eosinophil Level

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2014 to 2017Enrolled674ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmsMepolizumab, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Exacerbations and Healthcare Burden of COPD with Type 2 Inflammation: US Claims Analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ian D PavordNuffield Department of Medicine and Oxford Respiratory NIHR BRC, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4288-5973
Kenneth R ChapmanAsthma & Airway Centre, UHN and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2498-9859
Mona BafadhelNuffield Department of Medicine and Oxford Respiratory NIHR BRC, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9993-2478
Frank C SciurbaDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Eric S BradfordRespiratory Therapeutic Area, GSK, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Stephanie Schweiker HarrisRespiratory Therapeutic Area, GSK, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Bhabita MayerClinical Statistics, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.
David B RubinRespiratory Therapeutic Area, GSK, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Steven W YanceyRespiratory Therapeutic Area, GSK, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Pierluigi PaggiaroDepartment of Surgery, Medicine, Molecular Biology, and Critical Care, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A pre-specified meta-analysis of individual patient data from the 52-week METREX and METREO trials, which investigated mepolizumab for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in patients with blood eosinophil counts ≥150 cells/µL (screening) or ≥300 cells/µL (prior year) and frequent exacerbations, enables more robust characterization of mepolizumab efficacy in COPD and exploration of the relationship between blood eosinophil count and treatment responses. Methods: In METREX (117106/NCT02105948) and METREO (117113/NCT02105961), randomized patients received mepolizumab or placebo added to existing inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-based triple maintenance therapy. The annual rate of moderate/severe exacerbations (primary endpoint) was compared between subcutaneous (SC) mepolizumab 100 mg versus placebo (primary comparison of interest) and all doses (100 mg and 300 mg SC) versus placebo in patients with blood eosinophil counts ≥150 cells/µL at screening or ≥300 cells/µL in the prior year. Secondary/other endpoints included time to first moderate/severe exacerbation, exacerbations leading to emergency department visit/hospitalization and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). A predictive model of the relationship between screening blood eosinophil counts and exacerbation rates included data from all randomized patients. Results: In total, 1510 patients were randomized in METREX and METREO and 1136 patients were included in the pre-specified meta-analysis. From the meta-analysis, mepolizumab 100 mg SC significantly reduced annual moderate/severe exacerbation rates versus placebo by 18% (rate ratio: 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.71, 0.95; p=0.006) and delayed time to first moderate/severe exacerbation (hazard ratio: 0.80 [0.68, 0.94]; p=0.006). Mepolizumab 100 mg SC versus placebo numerically reduced exacerbations leading to ED visits/hospitalization and improved HRQoL. A modelling approach demonstrated increasing efficacy for moderate/severe exacerbations with increasing screening blood eosinophil count; this relationship was more pronounced for exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids (post hoc). The all-doses comparison had similar results. Conclusion: Mepolizumab reduces exacerbations in patients with eosinophil-associated COPD. Results suggest that blood eosinophil counts (≥150 cells/µL at screening or ≥300 cells/µL in the prior year) allow for identification of patients with COPD who experience exacerbations while treated with maximal ICS-based triple maintenance therapy who are likely to benefit from mepolizumab.

Indexed as

EosinophilsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDisease ProgressionHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedmepolizumabCOPDeosinophilexacerbationmepolizumab

Identifiers

PMID34163157
PMCPMC8215850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.