SynthesisInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2021
Mepolizumab for Eosinophil-Associated COPD: Analysis of METREX and METREO.
Synthesis in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study MEA117106: Mepolizumab vs. Placebo as add-on Treatment for Frequently Exacerbating COPD Patients
Study MEA117113: Mepolizumab vs. Placebo as Add-on Treatment for Frequently Exacerbating COPD Patients Characterized by Eosinophil Level
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Pooled it
- Anti-type 2 monoclonal antibody therapy for eosinophilic COPD beyond triple therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis with strict eosinophil inclusion criteria.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Network meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies and traditional conventional dichotomous agents for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Dupilumab in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a pooled analysis of emergency department visits, hospital admissions, and systemic corticosteroid use.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026Trial
- Astegolimab for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with frequent exacerbations: pooled analysis of the ALIENTO and ARNASA trials.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026Trial
- Different Inflammatory Phenotypes and Immune Endotypes Drive Disease Heterogeneity in Asthma and COPD.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Review
- Real-World Effectiveness of Mepolizumab Initiation in Treating Asthma and Concurrent Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the US.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Article
- Bridging the Knowledge Gap: Transforming COPD Management Through Lessons from Asthma.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Review
- Eosinophil biology in COPD: from scientific insight to clinical treatment action.ERJ open research · 2026Review
- Integrative Omics of Eosinophils in Asthma and COPD: Deciphering Molecular Signatures for Targeted Therapy.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Review
- From Inflammation to Precision Medicine: Mechanistic Insights into Asthma, COPD, and IPF.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Beyond Blood Eosinophils: Target-Tier Heterogeneity and Patient Enrichment in COPD Type 2 Inflammation.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Is blood eosinophilia a treatable trait in chronic obstructive airway diseases?Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Identification of imaging-based pulmonary and extrapulmonary treatable traits in COPD: a review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Exacerbations and Healthcare Burden of COPD with Type 2 Inflammation: US Claims Analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Biological treatments for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.BMJ medicine · 2026Review
- Role of IL-5 in eosinophil-associated diseases and prospects for multi-target therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Unmet Needs and New Opportunities in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Italy: A Narrative Review with Insights from the GULP Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Review
- Type 2 inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A promising treatable trait and practice recommendations.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2025Article
- Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A pre-specified meta-analysis of individual patient data from the 52-week METREX and METREO trials, which investigated mepolizumab for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in patients with blood eosinophil counts ≥150 cells/µL (screening) or ≥300 cells/µL (prior year) and frequent exacerbations, enables more robust characterization of mepolizumab efficacy in COPD and exploration of the relationship between blood eosinophil count and treatment responses. Methods: In METREX (117106/NCT02105948) and METREO (117113/NCT02105961), randomized patients received mepolizumab or placebo added to existing inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-based triple maintenance therapy. The annual rate of moderate/severe exacerbations (primary endpoint) was compared between subcutaneous (SC) mepolizumab 100 mg versus placebo (primary comparison of interest) and all doses (100 mg and 300 mg SC) versus placebo in patients with blood eosinophil counts ≥150 cells/µL at screening or ≥300 cells/µL in the prior year. Secondary/other endpoints included time to first moderate/severe exacerbation, exacerbations leading to emergency department visit/hospitalization and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). A predictive model of the relationship between screening blood eosinophil counts and exacerbation rates included data from all randomized patients. Results: In total, 1510 patients were randomized in METREX and METREO and 1136 patients were included in the pre-specified meta-analysis. From the meta-analysis, mepolizumab 100 mg SC significantly reduced annual moderate/severe exacerbation rates versus placebo by 18% (rate ratio: 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.71, 0.95; p=0.006) and delayed time to first moderate/severe exacerbation (hazard ratio: 0.80 [0.68, 0.94]; p=0.006). Mepolizumab 100 mg SC versus placebo numerically reduced exacerbations leading to ED visits/hospitalization and improved HRQoL. A modelling approach demonstrated increasing efficacy for moderate/severe exacerbations with increasing screening blood eosinophil count; this relationship was more pronounced for exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids (post hoc). The all-doses comparison had similar results. Conclusion: Mepolizumab reduces exacerbations in patients with eosinophil-associated COPD. Results suggest that blood eosinophil counts (≥150 cells/µL at screening or ≥300 cells/µL in the prior year) allow for identification of patients with COPD who experience exacerbations while treated with maximal ICS-based triple maintenance therapy who are likely to benefit from mepolizumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.