Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34163148›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2021

Medication Management Frameworks in the Context of Self-Management: A Scoping Review.

Lauren Cadel, Stephanie R Cimino, Teagan Rolf von den Baumen, Kadesha A James, Lisa McCarthy, Sara J T Guilcher

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Medication self-management toolkits for adults with multiple sclerosis: A scoping review.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren CadelLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6925-8163
Stephanie R CiminoRehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Teagan Rolf von den BaumenLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8976-8902
Kadesha A JamesLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lisa McCarthyLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sara J T GuilcherLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9552-9139
University of Toronto · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMany individuals take multiple prescribed and unprescribed medications, also known as polypharmacy, which can be problematic. Improving medication self-management is important; however, most medication management frameworks focus on adherence and limit the integration of the core components of self-management. Therefore, the objective of this scoping review was to identify what is reported in the literature on medication management frameworks or models within the context of self-management.

methodsElectronic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Library) and grey literature (healthcare and government organization websites) were searched for articles that described a framework or model developed or adapted for medication management, included components of self-management and was published from January 2000 to January 2020. During the screening of titles and abstracts, 5668 articles were reviewed, 5242 were excluded and 426 were then assessed at the full-text level. Thirty-nine articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review.

resultsAbout half of the frameworks were newly developed (n=20), while the other half were adapted from, or applied, a previous model or framework (n=19). The majority of frameworks focused on medication adherence and most of the self-management domains were categorized as medical management, followed by emotional and role management.

conclusionMedication self-management is a complex process and often impacts multiple areas of an individual's life. It is important for future frameworks to incorporate a comprehensive, holistic conceptualization of self-management that is inclusive of the three self-management domains - medical, emotional and role management.

Indexed as

frameworkmedication therapy managementmodelreviewself-management

Identifiers

PMID34163148
PMCPMC8216068
OpenAlexW3169108569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.