Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34162932›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Computational biomechanical modelling of the rabbit cranium during mastication.

Peter J Watson, Alana C Sharp, Tarun Choudhary, Michael J Fagan, Hugo Dutel, Susan E Evans, Flora Gröning

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Peter J WatsonDepartment of Engineering, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK. p.j.watson@hull.ac.uk.
Alana C SharpInstitute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK.
Tarun ChoudharyDepartment of Engineering, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
Michael J FaganDepartment of Engineering, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
Hugo DutelDepartment of Engineering, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
Susan E EvansCentre for Integrative Anatomy, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Flora GröningAberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
University of Hull · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I008462/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M008061/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M008525/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M010287/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although a functional relationship between bone structure and mastication has been shown in some regions of the rabbit skull, the biomechanics of the whole cranium during mastication have yet to be fully explored. In terms of cranial biomechanics, the rabbit is a particularly interesting species due to its uniquely fenestrated rostrum, the mechanical function of which is debated. In addition, the rabbit processes food through incisor and molar biting within a single bite cycle, and the potential influence of these bite modes on skull biomechanics remains unknown. This study combined the in silico methods of multi-body dynamics and finite element analysis to compute musculoskeletal forces associated with a range of incisor and molar biting, and to predict the associated strains. The results show that the majority of the cranium, including the fenestrated rostrum, transmits masticatory strains. The peak strains generated over all bites were found to be attributed to both incisor and molar biting. This could be a consequence of a skull shape adapted to promote an even strain distribution for a combination of infrequent incisor bites and cyclic molar bites. However, some regions, such as the supraorbital process, experienced low peak strain for all masticatory loads considered, suggesting such regions are not designed to resist masticatory forces.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCephalometryFinite Element AnalysisIncisorMasseter MuscleMasticationMaxillaMolarRabbitsSkullStress, MechanicalWeight-Bearing

Identifiers

PMID34162932
PMCPMC8222361
OpenAlexW3175953931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.