ArticleScientific reports2021
A novel computer-aided diagnostic system for accurate detection and grading of liver tumors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- LI-RADS-aligned artificial intelligence for liver cancer diagnosis: methods, evidence, and clinical readiness.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Integrated multi-task learning framework for hepatocellular carcinoma segmentation and histological grading using fused multi-phase MRI.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Radiomics-based signature of breast cancer on preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI to predict axillary metastasis.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- FSS-ULivR: a clinically-inspired few-shot segmentation framework for liver imaging using unified representations and attention mechanisms.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Effective Tumor Annotation for Automated Diagnosis of Liver Cancer.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2025Article
- Advanced Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of Current and Novel Techniques.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2024Review
- A deep learning-based radiomics model for predicting lymph node status from lung adenocarcinoma.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Current status of magnetic resonance imaging radiomics in hepatocellular carcinoma: A quantitative review with Radiomics Quality Score.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Assessment of LI-RADS efficacy in classification of hepatocellular carcinoma and benign liver nodules using DCE-MRI features and machine learning.European journal of radiology open · 2023Article
- MANet: a multi-attention network for automatic liver tumor segmentation in computed tomography (CT) imaging.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A personalized classification of behavioral severity of autism spectrum disorder using a comprehensive machine learning framework.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Prediction of Wilms' Tumor Susceptibility to Preoperative Chemotherapy Using a Novel Computer-Aided Prediction System.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Role of Radiomics and AI Technologies in the Segmentation, Detection, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cancers · 2022Review
- A Novel System for Precise Grading of Glioma.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Role of Medical Image Modalities and AI in the Early Detection, Diagnosis and Grading of Retinal Diseases: A Survey.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Evaluation of liver tumor identification rate of volumetric-interpolated breath-hold images using the compressed sensing method and qualitative evaluation of tumor contrast effect via visual evaluation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Models for Predicting P504s/P63 Immunohistochemical Expression: A Noninvasive Diagnostic Tool for Prostate Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- The fractal and textural analysis of glomeruli in obese and non-obese patients.Journal of pathology informatics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the world. The primary goals of this manuscript are the identification of novel imaging markers (morphological, functional, and anatomical/textural), and development of a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) system to accurately detect and grade liver tumors non-invasively. A total of 95 patients with liver tumors (M = 65, F = 30, age range = 34-82 years) were enrolled in the study after consents were obtained. 38 patients had benign tumors (LR1 = 19 and LR2 = 19), 19 patients had intermediate tumors (LR3), and 38 patients had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) malignant tumors (LR4 = 19 and LR5 = 19). A multi-phase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) was collected to extract the imaging markers. A comprehensive CAD system was developed, which includes the following main steps: i) estimation of morphological markers using a new parametric spherical harmonic model, ii) estimation of textural markers using a novel rotation invariant gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) and gray-level run-length matrix (GLRLM) models, and iii) calculation of the functional markers by estimating the wash-in/wash-out slopes, which enable quantification of the enhancement characteristics across different CE-MR phases. These markers were subsequently processed using a two-stages random forest-based classifier to classify the liver tumor as benign, intermediate, or malignant and determine the corresponding grade (LR1, LR2, LR3, LR4, or LR5). The overall CAD system using all the identified imaging markers achieved a sensitivity of 91.8%±0.9%, specificity of 91.2%±1.9%, and F[Formula: see text] score of 0.91±0.01, using the leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) cross-validation approach. Importantly, the CAD system achieved overall accuracies of [Formula: see text], 85%±2%, 78%±3%, 83%±4%, and 79%±3% in grading liver tumors into LR1, LR2, LR3, LR4, and LR5, respectively. In addition to LOSO, the developed CAD system was tested using randomly stratified 10-fold and 5-fold cross-validation approaches. Alternative classification algorithms, including support vector machine, naive Bayes classifier, k-nearest neighbors, and linear discriminant analysis all produced inferior results compared to the proposed two stage random forest classification model. These experiments demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed CAD system as a novel tool to objectively assess liver tumors based on the new comprehensive imaging markers. The identified imaging markers and CAD system can be used as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for early and accurate detection and grading of liver cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.