Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34162852›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

In-silico trial of intracranial flow diverters replicates and expands insights from conventional clinical trials.

Ali Sarrami-Foroushani, Toni Lassila, Michael MacRaild, Joshua Asquith, Kit C B Roes, James V Byrne, Alejandro F Frangi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05526352 (@neurIST), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05526352 recruitingnot on this map

@neurIST : Informatique biomédicale intégrée Pour la Gestion Des anévrismes cérébraux

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Hospital, GenevaRan2015 to 2040Enrolled20,000ConditionsIntracranial Aneurysm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical Data for Parametrization ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Automated generation of ablation lesion masks: a unison of electro and optic flow mapping for persistent AF virtual cohorts.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Computational modelling of biological systems now and then: revisiting tools and visions from the beginning of the century.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ali Sarrami-ForoushaniCentre for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine (CISTIB), School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8944-449X
Toni LassilaCentre for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine (CISTIB), School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8947-1447
Michael MacRaildCentre for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine (CISTIB), School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Joshua AsquithCentre for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine (CISTIB), School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Kit C B RoesDepartment of Health Evidence, Section of Biostatistics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
James V ByrneDepartment of Neuroradiology, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1268-3000
Alejandro F FrangiCentre for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine (CISTIB), School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. a.frangi@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2675-528X
University of Leeds · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cost of clinical trials is ever-increasing. In-silico trials rely on virtual populations and interventions simulated using patient-specific models and may offer a solution to lower these costs. We present the flow diverter performance assessment (FD-PASS) in-silico trial, which models the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in 164 virtual patients with 82 distinct anatomies with a flow-diverting stent, using computational fluid dynamics to quantify post-treatment flow reduction. The predicted FD-PASS flow-diversion success rates replicate the values previously reported in three clinical trials. The in-silico approach allows broader investigation of factors associated with insufficient flow reduction than feasible in a conventional trial. Our findings demonstrate that in-silico trials of endovascular medical devices can: (i) replicate findings of conventional clinical trials, and (ii) perform virtual experiments and sub-group analyses that are difficult or impossible in conventional trials to discover new insights on treatment failure, e.g. in the presence of side-branches or hypertension.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationHydrodynamicsStentsAdultAlgorithmsClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalReproducibility of ResultsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID34162852
PMCPMC8222326
OpenAlexW3122608793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.