Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34162662›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open

Assessing the prevalence and correlates of prenatal cannabis consumption in an urban Canadian population: a cross-sectional survey.

Kaija P Kaarid, Nancy Vu, Katelyn Bartlett, Tejal Patel, Sapna Sharma, Richard D Honor, Alison K Shea

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaija P KaaridDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Kaarid, Vu, Bartlett, Patel, Sharma, Shea), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Biology (Honor), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.
Nancy VuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Kaarid, Vu, Bartlett, Patel, Sharma, Shea), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Biology (Honor), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.
Katelyn BartlettDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Kaarid, Vu, Bartlett, Patel, Sharma, Shea), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Biology (Honor), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.
Tejal PatelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Kaarid, Vu, Bartlett, Patel, Sharma, Shea), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Biology (Honor), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.
Sapna SharmaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Kaarid, Vu, Bartlett, Patel, Sharma, Shea), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Biology (Honor), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.
Richard D HonorDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Kaarid, Vu, Bartlett, Patel, Sharma, Shea), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Biology (Honor), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.
Alison K SheaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Kaarid, Vu, Bartlett, Patel, Sharma, Shea), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Biology (Honor), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. sheaak@mcmaster.ca.
Queen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecreational cannabis use was legalized in Canada in October 2018. We aimed to determine the prevalence and correlates of cannabis consumption among pregnant individuals in a single Canadian city following national legalization.

methodsOver the period May to October 2019, we distributed an anonymous cross-sectional survey to pregnant patients attending family practice, midwifery, and low-risk and high-risk obstetrics clinics in Hamilton, Ontario. Eligibility was based on English literacy and current pregnancy. The survey included questions regarding lifetime and in-pregnancy cannabis use, intent for postpartum use and patterns of use. We also collected demographic information. We calculated descriptive statistics and performed logistic regression analyses to explore the relations between cannabis consumption and demographic characteristics.

resultsOf 531 pregnant individuals approached, 478 agreed and were able to participate, for a 90% participation rate. Among these 478 respondents, 54 (11%) reported consuming cannabis at some point during the pregnancy and 20 (4%) reported currently consuming cannabis. Among the 460 respondents who intended to breastfeed, 23 (5%) planned to consume cannabis during the postpartum period. Of 20 current users, 13 (65%) reported consuming cannabis at least weekly and 19 (95%) reported nausea, sleep problems or anxiety as reasons for use. Respondents without postsecondary education had 10.0-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.6-23.5) greater odds of prenatal cannabis consumption than university-educated respondents. In addition, respondents who reported that their partners used cannabis had 3.9-fold (95% CI 2.2-7.3) greater odds of prenatal cannabis consumption than those who reported that their partners did not use cannabis.

interpretationLower educational attainment and partners' cannabis consumption were associated with greater odds of inpregnancy cannabis use. These results may help to inform early intervention strategies to decrease cannabis consumption during this vulnerable period of fetal and neonatal development.

Indexed as

Educational StatusMarijuana UsePregnancy ComplicationsSpousesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDemographyFemaleFetal DevelopmentHumansMaleOntarioPeripartum PeriodPregnancyPrevalencePreventive Health Services

Identifiers

PMID34162662
PMCPMC8248560
OpenAlexW3174588663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.