Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34162649›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2021

Functional results of total-knee arthroplasty versus medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: two-year results of a randomised, assessor-blinded multicentre trial.

Jani Knifsund, Tuukka Niinimaki, Heikki Nurmi, Alar Toom, Hannes Keemu, Inari Laaksonen, Matti Seppänen, Antti Liukas, Konsta Pamilo, T Vahlberg and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02481427 (Total Knee Arthroplasty Versus Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02481427 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Total Knee Arthroplasty Versus Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty: a Randomized, Double-blind Multicenter Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTurku University HospitalRan2015 to 2027Enrolled140ConditionsOsteoarthritis, KneeArmsUnicondylar Knee Replacement, Total Knee Replacement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Insufficient evidence to confirm benefits of custom partial knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Survival of Patient-Specific Unicondylar Knee Replacement.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jani KnifsundDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland Jani.Knifsund@tyks.fi.ORCID 0000-0003-2787-3648
Tuukka NiinimakiDepartment of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Heikki NurmiDepartment of Surgery, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Alar ToomDepartment of Surgery, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Hannes KeemuDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Inari LaaksonenDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Matti SeppänenDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Antti LiukasDepartment of Anesthesiology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Konsta PamiloDepartment of Surgery, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
T VahlbergDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Ville ÄärimaaDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
K T MäkeläDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe primary objective of the trial was to assess the clinical effectiveness of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated medial osteoarthritis of the knee.

designProspective, randomised, 2 years, assessor-blind, multicentre, superiority trial.

settingThe patients were enrolled between December 2015 and May 2018 from the outpatient clinics of three public high-volume arthroplasty hospitals (Finland).

participantsWe recruited 143 patients with symptomatic-isolated medial osteoarthritis of the knee needing an arthroplasty procedure. All the patients were suitable for both unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasties. Population was selected as the end-stage-isolated medial osteoarthritis.

interventionsAll patients, randomized 1:1, received a medial unicompartmental arthroplasty or a total knee arthroplasty through a similar midline skin incision. Patients were blinded to the type of arthroplasty for the whole 2 years of follow-up.

main outcome measuresPrimary outcome measure was between-group differences in the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and secondary outcome Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS) at 2 years postoperatively. The changes within and between the groups were analysed with analysis of variance for repeated measurements.

resultsThe primary outcome was comparable for medial unicompartmental arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty at 2 years. The mean difference in the OKS between the groups was 1.6 points (95% CI -0.7 to 3.9). In the KOOS subscales, the mean difference between the groups was 0.1 points (95% CI -4.8 to 5.0) for pain, 7.8 points (95% CI 1.5 to 14.0) for symptoms, 4.3 points (95% CI -0.6 to 9.2) for function in daily living, 4.3 points (95% CI -3.0 to 11.6) for function in sports, and 2.1 points (95% CI -4.8 to 9.1) for knee-related quality of life.

conclusionsThe recovery after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty was faster compared with total knee arthroplasty, but unicompartmental arthroplasty did not provide a better patient-reported outcome at 2 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02481427.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisOsteoarthritis, KneeFinlandHumansKnee JointProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment Outcomeadult orthopaedicskneemusculoskeletal disordersorthopaedic & trauma surgery

Identifiers

PMID34162649
PMCPMC8231055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.