ArticleBMJ open2021
Birth defects surveillance after assisted reproductive technology in Beijing: a whole of population-based cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Congenital anomalies observed in children conceived through assisted reproductive technology-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Pooled it
- Assisted Reproductive Techniques and Risk of Congenital Heart Diseases in Children: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2023Pooled it
- Effects of assisted reproductive techniques on offspring cardiovascular health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- Prevalence and death rate of birth defects from population-based surveillance in Hunan Province, China, 2010-2020.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Cardiovascular health of offspring conceived by assisted reproduction technology: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Is there a relationship between assisted reproductive technology and maternal outcomes? A systematic review of cohort studies.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2023Review
- Comparison of Genetic Profiles of Neonates in Intensive Care Units Conceived With or Without Assisted Reproductive Technology.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Prognosis of Congenital Anomalies in Conceptions FollowingFrontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the differences in the prevalence of birth defects among offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART) and conceived spontaneously (non-ART), and assess the contribution of ART to birth defects.
designA population-based retrospective cohort study.
settingBeijing.
participantsPregnant women whose expected date of childbirth was verified as occurring between October 2014 and September 2015, and were registered on the Beijing Maternal and Child Health Information Network System, were the recorded pregnancy outcomes. 2699 ART offspring and 191 368 non-ART offspring (live births, stillbirths and medical terminations) were included in our study.
interventionsNone. OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk ratios (RR) for birth defects were calculated among ART conceptions and non-ART conceptions with confounding factors by using logistic regression models.
results194 067 offspring were included in the present study, and 2699 (1.4%) were conceived using ART. Among all the births, the prevalence of any birth defect in the ART offspring (5.5%) was significantly higher than in the non-ART offspring (3.8%) (crude RR, 1.49, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.76). After adjusting for confounding factors, ART use was still associated with an increased risk of any birth defect (5.4% vs 3.5% in ART and non-ART group, adjusted RR (aRR), 1.43, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.90), especially for chromosomal abnormalities (0.5% vs 0.2% in ART and non-ART group, aRR, 3.11, 95% CI 1.28 to 7.58), in singleton births to mothers <35 years. Circulatory system malformations and musculoskeletal system malformations were observed to have a non-significant increase in offspring conceived by ART. However, the associations between ART and birth defects were not detected in multiple births or mothers ≥35 years.
conclusionsThis study confirmed a small but significant association between ART and birth defects. However, the risk tends to be non-significant under the conditions of advanced maternal age or multiple pregnancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.