Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34162442›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2021

CT-based multi-phase Radiomic models for differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Menglin Chen, Fu Yin, Yuanmeng Yu, Haijie Zhang, Ge Wen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Solitary fibrous tumor of the renal pelvis: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Menglin Chen *Medical Imaging teaching and research office, Nanfang hospital, Southern Medical University, No.1838 Guangzhoudadao Avenue north, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Fu Yin *College of Electronics and Information Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518068, China.
Yuanmeng YuDepartment of MRI, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, No. 157 Jinbi Road, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China.
Haijie ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, No.3002, West Sungang Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, 518052, China. zhanghaijie1984@163.com.
Ge WenMedical Imaging teaching and research office, Nanfang hospital, Southern Medical University, No.1838 Guangzhoudadao Avenue north, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China. m13360022166@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2114-9157

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the study is to compare the diagnostic value of models that based on a set of CT texture and non-texture features for differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinomas(ccRCCs) from non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas(non-ccRCCs).

methodsA total of 197 pathologically proven renal tumors were divided into ccRCC(n = 143) and non-ccRCC (n = 54) groups. The 43 non-texture features and 296 texture features that extracted from the 3D volume tumor tissue were assessed for each tumor at both Non-contrast Phase, NCP; Corticomedullary Phase, CMP; Nephrographic Phase, NP and Excretory Phase, EP. Texture-score were calculated by the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) to screen the most valuable texture features. Model 1 contains the three most distinctive non-texture features with p < 0.001, Model 2 contains texture scores, and Model 3 contains the above two types of features.

resultsThe three models shown good discrimination of the ccRCC from non-ccRCC in NCP, CMP, NP, and EP. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)values of the Model 1, Model 2, and Model 3 in differentiating the two groups were 0.748-0.823, 0.776-0.887 and 0.864-0.900, respectively. The difference in AUC between every two of the three Models was statistically significant (p < 0.001).

conclusionsThe predictive efficacy of ccRCC was significantly improved by combining non-texture features and texture features to construct a combined diagnostic model, which could provide a reliable basis for clinical treatment options.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellCell DifferentiationHumansKidney NeoplasmsMiddle AgedRadiometryRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedClear cell renal cell carcinomaImproved enhanced parametersLASSO regressionRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID34162442
PMCPMC8220848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.