Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34162405›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2021

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of descending thoracic aorta calcification in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Elbert Edy, Alastair J Rankin, Jennifer S Lees, Pauline Hall Barrientos, Rosemary Woodward, Sokratis Stoumpos, Ioannis Koktzoglou, Robert R Edelman, Aleksandra Radjenovic, Patrick B Mark and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. 2021-2022 state of our JCMR.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Elbert Edy *Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK. elbertedy@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9476-4911
Alastair J Rankin *Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK.
Jennifer S LeesInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK.
Pauline Hall BarrientosDepartment of Clinical Physics and Bioengineering, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Rosemary WoodwardClinical Research Imaging, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Sokratis StoumposInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK.
Ioannis KoktzoglouRadiology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.
Robert R EdelmanRadiology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.
Aleksandra RadjenovicInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK.
Patrick B Mark *Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK.
Giles H Roditi *Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK.
Queen Elizabeth University Hospital · GBNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBNorthShore University HealthSystem · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

British Heart Foundation of Excellence Award RE/13/5/30177Chief Scientist Office CAF/18/02Chief Scientist Office PCL/20/10Medical Research Council MR/N003403/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVascular calcification is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease. Computed tomography (CT) is the gold-standard for detecting vascular calcification. Radial volumetric-interpolated breath-hold examination (radial-VIBE), a free-breathing gradient-echo cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) sequence, has advantages over CT as it is ionising radiation-free. However, its capability in detecting thoracic aortic calcification (TAC) has not been investigated. This study aims to compare radial-VIBE to CT for the detection of TAC in the descending aorta of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) using semi-automated methods, and to investigate the association between TAC and coronary artery calcification (CAC).

methodsPaired cardiac CT and radial-VIBE CMR scans from ESRD patients participating in 2 prospective studies were obtained. Calcification volume was quantified using semi-automated methods in a 9 cm segment of the thoracic aorta. Correlation and agreement between TAC volume measured on CMR and CT were assessed with Spearman's correlation coefficient (ρ), linear regression, Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Association between CAC Agatston score and TAC volume determined by CT and CMR was measured with Spearman's correlation coefficient.

resultsScans from 96 participants were analysed. Positive correlation was found between CMR and CT calcification volume [ρ = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.73]. ICC for consistency was 0.537 (95% CI 0.378-0.665). Bland-Altman plot revealed that compared to CT, CMR volumes were systematically higher at low calcification volume, and lower at high calcification volume. CT did not detect calcification in 41.7% of participants, while radial-VIBE CMR detected signal which the semi-quantitative algorithm reported as calcification in all of those individuals. Instances of suboptimal radial-VIBE CMR image quality were deemed to be the major contributors to the discrepancy. Correlations between CAC Agatston score and TAC volume measured by CT and CMR were ρ = 0.404 (95% CI 0.214-0.565) and ρ = 0.211 (95% CI 0.008-0.396), respectively.

conclusionRadial-VIBE CMR can detect TAC with strong positive association to CT, albeit with the presence of proportional bias. Quantification of vascular calcification by radial-VIBE remains a promising area for future research, but improvements in image quality are necessary.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseKidney Failure, ChronicAorta, ThoracicHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesCardiovascular diseaseComputed tomographyEnd-stage renal diseaseMagnetic resonance imagingRadial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (radial-VIBE) sequenceThoracic aortic calcification

Identifiers

PMID34162405
PMCPMC8223384
OpenAlexW3176822050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.