Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34162367›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2021

Implementation of HPV-based screening in Burkina Faso: lessons learned from the PARACAO hybrid-effectiveness study.

Keitly Mensah, Charles Kaboré, Salifou Zeba, Magali Bouchon, Véronique Duchesne, Dolorès Pourette, Pierre DeBeaudrap, Alexandre Dumont

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Keitly MensahCentre Population et Développement (Ceped), Inserm ERL 1244, UMR Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD) et Université de Paris, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75006, Paris, France. Keitly.mensah@ird.fr.
Charles KaboréInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de La Santé (IRSS), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Salifou ZebaLaboratoire de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Sciences sociales et Santé (LARISS), Université Ouaga 1, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Magali BouchonPôle Recherche et Apprentissages, Médecins du Monde, Paris, France.
Véronique DuchesneCentre Population et Développement (Ceped), Inserm ERL 1244, UMR Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD) et Université de Paris, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75006, Paris, France.
Dolorès PouretteCentre Population et Développement (Ceped), Inserm ERL 1244, UMR Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD) et Université de Paris, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75006, Paris, France.
Pierre DeBeaudrapCentre Population et Développement (Ceped), Inserm ERL 1244, UMR Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD) et Université de Paris, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75006, Paris, France.
Alexandre DumontCentre Population et Développement (Ceped), Inserm ERL 1244, UMR Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD) et Université de Paris, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75006, Paris, France.
Inserm · FRCentre Population et Développement · FRInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement · FRInstitut des Mondes Africains · FRUniversité Joseph Ki-Zerbo · BF

Funding

Sidaction Young Researcher Award #12218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer screening in sub-Saharan countries relies on primary visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA). Primary human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening is considered a promising alternative. However, the implementation and real-life effectiveness of this strategy at the primary-care level in limited-resource contexts remain under explored. In Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, free HPV-based screening was implemented in 2019 in two primary healthcare centers. We carried out a process and effectiveness evaluation of this intervention.

methodsEffectiveness outcomes and implementation indicators were assessed through a cohort study of screened women, observations in participating centers, individual interviews with women and healthcare providers and monitoring reports. Effectiveness outcomes were screening completeness and women's satisfaction. Logistic regression models and concurrent qualitative analysis explored how implementation variability, acceptability by women and the context affected effectiveness outcomes.

resultsAfter a 3-month implementation period, of the 350 women included in the cohort, 94% completed the screening, although only 26% had their screening completed in a single visit as planned in the protocol. The proportion of highly satisfied women was higher after result disclosure (95%) than after sampling (65%). A good understanding of the screening results and recommendations increased screening completeness and women's satisfaction, while time to result disclosure decreased satisfaction. Adaptations were made to fit healthcare workers' workload.

conclusionFree HPV-based screening was successfully integrated within primary care in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, leading to a high level of screening completeness despite the frequent use of multiple visits. Future implementation in primary healthcare centers needs to improve counseling and reduce wait times at the various steps of the screening sequence.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBurkina FasoCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningCervical cancerHPV screeningImplementationMixed-methodProcess evaluationSub-saharan africa

Identifiers

PMID34162367
PMCPMC8220722
OpenAlexW3173754940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.