Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34162364›Full record

ReviewBMC public health2021

Behavioural responses to Covid-19 health certification: a rapid review.

John Drury, Guanlan Mao, Ann John, Atiya Kamal, G James Rubin, Clifford Stott, Tushna Vandrevala, Theresa M Marteau

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Public views on the Covid-19 immunity certificate: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Public acceptability of COVID-19 control measures in Singapore, Hong Kong, and Malaysia: A cross-sectional survey.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

John DrurySchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK. j.drury@sussex.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7748-5128
Guanlan MaoSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8148-6855
Ann JohnSwansea University, Population Data Science, Swansea, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5657-6995
Atiya KamalDepartment of Psychology, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6651-6400
G James RubinDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4440-0570
Clifford StottSchool of Psychology, Keele University, Keele, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5399-3294
Tushna VandrevalaDepartment of Psychology, Kingston University, Kingston upon Thames, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1140-8445
Theresa M MarteauBehaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3025-1129
University of Sussex · GBBirmingham City University · GBKeele University · GBKing's College London · GBKingston University · GBSwansea University · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCovid-status certification - certificates for those who test negative for the SARS-CoV-2 virus, test positive for antibodies, or who have been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 - has been proposed to enable safer access to a range of activities. Realising these benefits will depend in part upon the behavioural and social impacts of certification. The aim of this rapid review was to describe public attitudes towards certification, and its possible impact on uptake of testing and vaccination, protective behaviours, and crime.

methodA search was undertaken in peer-reviewed databases, pre-print databases, and the grey literature, from 2000 to December 2020. Studies were included if they measured attitudes towards or behavioural consequences of health certificates based on one of three indices of Covid-19 status: test-negative result for current infectiousness, test-positive for antibodies conferring natural immunity, or vaccination(s) conferring immunity.

resultsThirty-three papers met the inclusion criteria, only three of which were rated as low risk of bias. Public attitudes were generally favourable towards the use of immunity certificates for international travel, but unfavourable towards their use for access to work and other activities. A significant minority was strongly opposed to the use of certificates of immunity for any purpose. The limited evidence suggested that intention to get vaccinated varied with the activity enabled by certification or vaccination (e.g., international travel). Where vaccination is seen as compulsory this could lead to unwillingness to accept a subsequent vaccination. There was some evidence that restricting access to settings and activities to those with antibody test certificates may lead to deliberate exposure to infection in a minority. Behaviours that reduce transmission may decrease upon health certificates based on any of the three indices of Covid-19 status, including physical distancing and handwashing.

conclusionsThe limited evidence suggests that health certification in relation to COVID-19 - outside of the context of international travel - has the potential for harm as well as benefit. Realising the benefits while minimising the harms will require real-time evaluations allowing modifications to maximise the potential contribution of certification to enable safer access to a range of activities.

Indexed as

COVID-19BiasCertificationHumansSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCovid-19Covid-status certificationHealth certificationHealth passportImmunity certificateImmunity passportMandatory vaccinationSARS-CoV-2Vaccination certificateVaccine passport

Identifiers

PMID34162364
PMCPMC8221819
OpenAlexW3175496923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.