Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34162327›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

Predicting antifreeze proteins with weighted generalized dipeptide composition and multi-regression feature selection ensemble.

Shunfang Wang, Lin Deng, Xinnan Xia, Zicheng Cao, Yu Fei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shunfang Wang *Department of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Information Science and Engineering, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650504, China. sfwang_66@ynu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1927-8753
Lin Deng *Department of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Information Science and Engineering, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650504, China.
Xinnan XiaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Information Science and Engineering, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650504, China. xiaxinnan1@163.com.
Zicheng CaoSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Yu FeiSchool of Statistics and Mathematics, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming, 650221, China. feiyu@ynufe.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 11661081National Natural Science Foundation of China 11971421National Natural Science Foundation of China 62062067Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province 2017FA032Training Plan for Young and Middle-aged Academic Leaders of Yunnan Province 2018HB031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntifreeze proteins (AFPs) are a group of proteins that inhibit body fluids from growing to ice crystals and thus improve biological antifreeze ability. It is vital to the survival of living organisms in extremely cold environments. However, little research is performed on sequences feature extraction and selection for antifreeze proteins classification in the structure and function prediction, which is of great significance.

resultsIn this paper, to predict the antifreeze proteins, a feature representation of weighted generalized dipeptide composition (W-GDipC) and an ensemble feature selection based on two-stage and multi-regression method (LRMR-Ri) are proposed. Specifically, four feature selection algorithms: Lasso regression, Ridge regression, Maximal information coefficient and Relief are used to select the feature sets, respectively, which is the first stage of LRMR-Ri method. If there exists a common feature subset among the above four sets, it is the optimal subset; otherwise we use Ridge regression to select the optimal subset from the public set pooled by the four sets, which is the second stage of LRMR-Ri. The LRMR-Ri method combined with W-GDipC was performed both on the antifreeze proteins dataset (binary classification), and on the membrane protein dataset (multiple classification). Experimental results show that this method has good performance in support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT) and stochastic gradient descent (SGD). The values of ACC, RE and MCC of LRMR-Ri and W-GDipC with antifreeze proteins dataset and SVM classifier have reached as high as 95.56%, 97.06% and 0.9105, respectively, much higher than those of each single method: Lasso, Ridge, Mic and Relief, nearly 13% higher than single Lasso for ACC.

conclusionThe experimental results show that the proposed LRMR-Ri and W-GDipC method can significantly improve the accuracy of antifreeze proteins prediction compared with other similar single feature methods. In addition, our method has also achieved good results in the classification and prediction of membrane proteins, which verifies its widely reliability to a certain extent.

Indexed as

DipeptidesSupport Vector MachineAlgorithmsAntifreeze ProteinsReproducibility of ResultsAntifreeze ProteinsDipeptidesAntifreeze proteins predictionEnsemble feature selectionLasso regressionRidge regressionTwo-stage multiple regressionsWeighted general dipeptide composition

Identifiers

PMID34162327
PMCPMC8220696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.