Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34162324›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2021

The INSPIRE Population Survey: development, dissemination and respondent characteristics.

Flaka Siqeca, Katrina Obas, Olivia Yip, Samuel Stenz, Penelope Vounatsou, Matthias Briel, Matthias Schwenkglenks, Carlos Quinto, Eva Blozik, Andreas Zeller and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Flaka SiqecaDepartment Public Health, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
Katrina ObasDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
Olivia YipDepartment Public Health, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
Samuel StenzDepartment Public Health, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
Penelope VounatsouDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
Matthias BrielDepartment of Clinical Research, Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
Matthias SchwenkglenksDepartment Public Health, Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
Carlos QuintoAerztegesellschaft Baselland, 4132, Muttenz, Switzerland.
Eva BlozikHelsana-Gruppe, 8001, Zürich, Switzerland.
Andreas ZellerDepartment Clinical Research, Center for Primary Health Care, University of Basel, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
Leah L ZulligDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
Sabina De GeestDepartment Public Health, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, 4051, Basel, Switzerland. sabina.degeest@unibas.ch.
Mieke DeschodtDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Gerontology and Geriatrics, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost older adults prefer to continue living at home despite increasing care needs and demand for services. To aid in maintaining independence, integrated care models for community-dwelling older people are promoted as the most cost-effective approach. The implementation of such care models is challenging and often the end-users are not involved or their needs are not considered. We conducted a population survey in order to understand the needs and preferences of home-dwelling older adults living in Canton Basel-Landschaft, Switzerland. The aims of this paper are to chronicle the development of the INSPIRE Population Survey, outline its variables and measurements, describe the marketing strategy utilized for survey dissemination and report on the response rate and respondent characteristics.

methodsThe INSPIRE Population Survey, conducted between March and August 2019, is a cross-sectional survey of older adults aged 75 and older living at home in Canton Basel-Landschaft. The questionnaire was developed by expert input and stakeholder involvement. Its readability and acceptability were pilot-tested with older people. To ensure the likelihood of a high and representative response rate, a meticulous step-by-step marketing strategy was developed prior to the dissemination of the questionnaire.

resultsThe overall response rate was 30.7% (n = 8,846), with variations between 20.6 and 34.5% across the different care regions in the canton. A generally higher response rate was found in the care regions with a higher density and which bordered the urban city of Basel. We received support from local stakeholders, policy makers and media through using a broad combination of marketing channels and targeting our community partners who have a strong relationship with our target audience.

conclusionsAlthough recruiting older adults in research is challenging, our study shows that a high response rate can be achieved by developing the survey through expert input and by involving all important stakeholders, including older adults, throughout the entire process.

Indexed as

Independent LivingAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandAgedCommunity-careDelivery of healthcareDemographic SurveyIntegratedStakeholder involvementSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34162324
PMCPMC8223353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.