Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34162276›Full record

ArticleThe journal of vascular access2023

Lessons learnt and future directions in managing dialysis access during the COVID 19 pandemic: Patient and provider experience in the United States.

Anil K Agarwal, Adrian Sequeira, Bharvi P Oza-Gajera, Karthik Ramani, Jeffrey Packer, Terry Litchfield, Mary Lea Nations, Edgar V Lerma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of vascular access, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anil K AgarwalUniversity of California San Francisco, Fresno, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3608-2848
Adrian SequeiraLouisiana State University, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Bharvi P Oza-GajeraUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5702-7384
Karthik RamaniUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jeffrey PackerUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Terry LitchfieldAccess Solutions, Blanchardville, WI, USA.
Mary Lea NationsAmerican Society of Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology, Clinton, MS, USA.
Edgar V LermaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago/Advocate Christ Medical Center, Oak Lawn, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0976-5478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID 19 pandemic adversely impacted delivery of preventive, routine, urgent, and essential care worldwide. Dialysis access care was particularly affected due to the lack of specific guidelines regarding procedures for its creation and maintenance. Early guidance by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid was inadvertently interpreted as guidance to stop dialysis access procedures. Prompt action by professional societies was needed to furnish detailed guidance to establish essential nature of these procedures.

methodsThe American Society of Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology (ASDIN) issued a joint statement with Vascular Access Society of the Americas (VASA) - "Maintaining Lifelines for ESKD Patients" to clearly establish the role of vascular access as a lifeline for ESKD (End Stage Kidney Disease) patients and the importance and urgency of its timely management. ASDIN also conducted a survey in mid-2020, that was administered to the ASDIN database as well as shared with the general public via the organization's social media platforms. The respondents reported their experiences in the care of dialysis access, practice patterns and the utility of the ASDIN-VASA statement during the COVID 19 pandemic.

resultsOf the 2030 individual surveys sent, 581 were opened and 53 (9.1%) responses were received from different parts of the country and from different practice settings. ASDIN COVID 19 triage document was frequently utilized and 83% of respondents found the document valuable. The survey also revealed multiple obstacles, including logistical and financial issues that led to significant disruption of services.

conclusionsThe care of dialysis access was significantly affected in the United States during the COVID 19 pandemic due to multiple reasons. ASDIN actions provided valuable specific guidance regarding and explored barriers to dialysis access care. We describe those results and discuss strategies to prevent COVID 19 transmission with innovative strategies of providing access care. Individualized decision making is of essence when considering dialysis access procedures.

Indexed as

COVID-19Kidney Failure, ChronicNephrologyAgedHumansMedicareRenal DialysisUnited StatesASDINCOVID 19Dialysis accessmaintaining lifelinespandemicprocedure guidancetelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34162276
PMCPMC10018246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.