ArticleNucleic acids research2021
TnpAREP and REP sequences dissemination in bacterial genomes: REP recognition determinants.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
REP, diverse palindromic DNA sequences found at high copy number in many bacterial genomes, have been attributed important roles in cell physiology but their dissemination mechanisms are poorly understood. They might represent non-autonomous transposable elements mobilizable by TnpAREP, the first prokaryotic domesticated transposase associated with REP. TnpAREP, fundamentally different from classical transposases, are members of the HuH superfamily and closely related to the transposases of the IS200/IS605 family. We previously showed that Escherichia coli TnpAREP processes cognate single stranded REP in vitro and that this activity requires the integrity of the REP structure, in particular imperfect palindromes interrupted by a bulge and preceded by a conserved DNA motif. A second group of REPs rather carry perfect palindromes, raising questions about how the latter are recognized by their cognate TnpAREP. To get insight into the importance of REP structural and sequence determinants in these two groups, we developed an in vitro activity assay coupled to a mutational analysis for three different TnpAREP/REP duos via a SELEX approach. We also tackled the question of how the cleavage site is selected. This study revealed that two TnpAREP groups have co-evolved with their cognate REPs and use different strategies to recognize their REP substrates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.