Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34161394›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2021

A field test of the dilution effect hypothesis in four avian multi-host pathogens.

Martina Ferraguti, Josué Martínez-de la Puente, Miguel Ángel Jiménez-Clavero, Francisco Llorente, David Roiz, Santiago Ruiz, Ramón Soriguer, Jordi Figuerola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Malaria Risk Drivers in the Brazilian Amazon: Land Use-Land Cover Interactions and Biological Diversity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martina FerragutiDepartment of Wetland Ecology, Doñana Biological Station (EBD-CSIC), Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7481-4355
Josué Martínez-de la PuenteDepartment of Wetland Ecology, Doñana Biological Station (EBD-CSIC), Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8055-4115
Miguel Ángel Jiménez-ClaveroCIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2125-9743
Francisco LlorenteCentro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CISA), Valdeolmos, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1566-0266
David RoizDepartment of Wetland Ecology, Doñana Biological Station (EBD-CSIC), Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5819-3648
Santiago RuizCIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Ramón SoriguerCIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Jordi FiguerolaDepartment of Wetland Ecology, Doñana Biological Station (EBD-CSIC), Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4664-9011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Dilution Effect Hypothesis (DEH) argues that greater biodiversity lowers the risk of disease and reduces the rates of pathogen transmission since more diverse communities harbour fewer competent hosts for any given pathogen, thereby reducing host exposure to the pathogen. DEH is expected to operate most intensely in vector-borne pathogens and when species-rich communities are not associated with increased host density. Overall, dilution will occur if greater species diversity leads to a lower contact rate between infected vectors and susceptible hosts, and between infected hosts and susceptible vectors. Field-based tests simultaneously analysing the prevalence of several multi-host pathogens in relation to host and vector diversity are required to validate DEH. We tested the relationship between the prevalence in house sparrows (Passer domesticus) of four vector-borne pathogens-three avian haemosporidians (including the avian malaria parasite Plasmodium and the malaria-like parasites Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon) and West Nile virus (WNV)-and vertebrate diversity. Birds were sampled at 45 localities in SW Spain for which extensive data on vector (mosquitoes) and vertebrate communities exist. Vertebrate censuses were conducted to quantify avian and mammal density, species richness and evenness. Contrary to the predictions of DEH, WNV seroprevalence and haemosporidian prevalence were not negatively associated with either vertebrate species richness or evenness. Indeed, the opposite pattern was found, with positive relationships between avian species richness and WNV seroprevalence, and Leucocytozoon prevalence being detected. When vector (mosquito) richness and evenness were incorporated into the models, all the previous associations between WNV prevalence and the vertebrate community variables remained unchanged. No significant association was found for Plasmodium prevalence and vertebrate community variables in any of the models tested. Despite the studied system having several characteristics that should favour the dilution effect (i.e., vector-borne pathogens, an area where vector and host densities are unrelated, and where host richness is not associated with an increase in host density), none of the relationships between host species diversity and species richness, and pathogen prevalence supported DEH and, in fact, amplification was found for three of the four pathogens tested. Consequently, the range of pathogens and communities studied needs to be broadened if we are to understand the ecological factors that favour dilution and how often these conditions occur in nature.

Indexed as

BiodiversityAnimalsBird DiseasesHaemosporidaPrevalenceProtozoan Infections, AnimalSpainSparrowsWest Nile Fever

Identifiers

PMID34161394
PMCPMC8221496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.